From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH V2 04/14] mem/ksm: convert to new API
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 17:29:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170707152945.GH28534@rei.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170707144945.GE28534@rei.lan>
Hi!
> > - tst_parse_opts(argc, argv, ksm_options, ksm_usage);
> > - setup();
> > - for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
> > - tst_count = 0;
> > - check_ksm_options(&size, &num, &unit);
> > - create_same_memory(size, num, unit);
> > - }
> > - cleanup();
> > - tst_exit();
> > + check_ksm_options(&size, &num, &unit);
>
> There is no need to parse the test options on every test iteration, this
> should be called once in the test setup.
>
> Moreover passing things around in global variables is messy. What about
> we (ideally in a separate patch) created a function(s) to parse the KSM
> options and pass the string values explicitily.
Or since we are about to create ksm_common.h anyway, we can add static
inline functions to parse the test options there as well. And FYI we do
have option parsing helpers in the tst_test.h library that are much
better than plain old atoi().
> setup(void)
> {
> ...
> parse_ksm_options(str_size, &size, str_num, &num, str_unit, &unit);
> ...
> }
>
> Also could we define the ksm_options array in one place instead of
> repeating it in each test. What about putting it into ksh_common.h in
> the mem/ksm/ directory and including it in each test?
>
> --
> Cyril Hrubis
> chrubis@suse.cz
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-07 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-10 10:05 [LTP] [PATCH V2 00/14] Convert LTP kernel/mem/testcase to New API Li Wang
2017-04-10 10:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 01/14] mem/lib: convert to new API Li Wang
2017-04-10 10:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 02/14] mem/oom: " Li Wang
2017-04-10 10:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 03/14] mem/oom: fix the timeout issue Li Wang
2017-07-07 15:11 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-07-10 7:01 ` Li Wang
2017-07-13 9:06 ` Richard Palethorpe
2017-07-14 3:16 ` Li Wang
2017-07-10 7:38 ` Jan Stancek
2017-04-10 10:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 04/14] mem/ksm: convert to new API Li Wang
2017-07-07 14:49 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-07-07 15:29 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2017-07-10 7:33 ` Li Wang
2017-04-10 10:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 05/14] mem/thp: " Li Wang
2017-07-07 15:27 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-07-11 4:32 ` Li Wang
2017-04-10 10:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 06/14] mem/hugetlb: " Li Wang
2017-04-10 10:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 07/14] mem/hugemmap: " Li Wang
2017-04-10 10:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 08/14] mem/hugeshmat: " Li Wang
2017-04-10 10:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 09/14] mem/hugeshmctl: " Li Wang
2017-04-10 10:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 10/14] mm/hugeshmdt: " Li Wang
2017-04-10 10:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 11/14] mem/hugeshmget: " Li Wang
2017-04-10 10:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 12/14] mem/cpuset: " Li Wang
2017-04-10 10:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 13/14] mem/swapping: " Li Wang
2017-04-10 10:05 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 14/14] mem/tunable: " Li Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170707152945.GH28534@rei.lan \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox