From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Hrubis Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:52:56 +0200 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] Test for CVE-2016-7042 in /proc/keys show function In-Reply-To: <87lgnd9bxh.fsf@our.domain.is.not.set> References: <20170725060341.14752-1-fenggw-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <87lgnd9bxh.fsf@our.domain.is.not.set> Message-ID: <20170818145256.GF22319@rei.lan> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi! I've created the lapi header meanwhile and so we can make use of it here but moreover, shouldn't we put this one into the syscalls/keyctl/ directory as we did with previous test and add only runtest CVE entry? I guess that it makes sense to put syscall tests to syscalls/foo/ directories in a case that we can clearly say that the bug was present in a particual syscall... -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz