From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Hrubis Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 14:48:02 +0200 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] lib6/in6_01.c: Remove IPv6 addresses which do not comply RFC 2373 In-Reply-To: <20170831195517.22786-1-pvorel@suse.cz> References: <20170831195517.22786-1-pvorel@suse.cz> Message-ID: <20170906124801.GE24177@rei.lan> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi! > glibc 2.26 starts rejecting IPv6 addresses which do not comply RFC 2373. > > commit 9a0cc8c1bd7645bf3c988890ffb59639c07a5812 > Author: Florian Weimer > Date: Fri Jun 23 22:51:00 2017 +0200 > > inet_pton: Reject IPv6 addresses with many leading zeros [BZ #16637] > > 2001:db8:00001::f is not a valid IPv6 address according to RFC 2373. > > See also: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16637 > > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel > --- > testcases/network/lib6/in6_01.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/testcases/network/lib6/in6_01.c b/testcases/network/lib6/in6_01.c > index f7186b480..3a96ed17d 100644 > --- a/testcases/network/lib6/in6_01.c > +++ b/testcases/network/lib6/in6_01.c > @@ -40,8 +40,6 @@ static struct { > { "::ffff:10.0.0.1", 1 }, > { "::fffe:10.0.0.1", 0 }, > { "::7fff:10.0.0.1", 0 }, > - { "0:0:0:0:0:0:ffff:0a001", 0 }, > - { "0:0:1:0:0:0:ffff:0a001", 0 }, ^ Shouldn't we just delete this leading zeroes from the last two lines and be donw with it? Or do you think that cases covered by this addresses without the leading zeroes are already covered by the rest of the addresses in the structure? -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz