From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:55:49 +0200
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] [RFC] lib/tst_test: Report 0 if test has both
 TPASS	and TCONF
In-Reply-To: <1529683625.10671733.1504855289141.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
References: <20170907155745.9116-1-chrubis@suse.cz>
 <1529683625.10671733.1504855289141.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170908085548.GA3444@rei>
List-Id: <ltp.lists.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ltp@lists.linux.it

Hi!
> > It's probably a bit more logical to report a succes if only part of the
> > test was skipped and the rest was sucessful. That way we can distinguish
> > tests that were compiled-out completely or where the kernel does not
> > support the particular syscall at all. The difference is about 15
> > testcases that report TPASS instead of TCONF after this change.
> 
> Looks good to me. I've noticed more TCONFs too with your all_filesystems patch,
> where some filesystems didn't support all features.

Pushed with your ack.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz