From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Hrubis Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 17:29:50 +0200 Subject: [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 2/7] m4: Fix libacl detection on 32-bit cross build In-Reply-To: <20171009110101.3329-3-pvorel@suse.cz> References: <20171009110101.3329-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20171009110101.3329-3-pvorel@suse.cz> Message-ID: <20171009152950.GE25633@rei.lan> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi! > configure.ac | 1 + > m4/ltp-acl.m4 | 7 +++---- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index 0bae6ce3f..e9c61ef78 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ AC_CHECK_HEADERS([ \ > linux/mempolicy.h \ > linux/module.h \ > linux/netlink.h \ > + sys/acl.h \ > sys/epoll.h \ > sys/inotify.h \ > sys/fanotify.h \ > diff --git a/m4/ltp-acl.m4 b/m4/ltp-acl.m4 > index 6b739346b..789fabe0b 100644 > --- a/m4/ltp-acl.m4 > +++ b/m4/ltp-acl.m4 > @@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ dnl LTP_CHECK_ACL_SUPPORT > dnl ---------------------------- > dnl > AC_DEFUN([LTP_CHECK_ACL_SUPPORT],[ > -AH_TEMPLATE(HAVE_LIBACL, > -[Define to 1 if you have libacl installed.]) > -AC_CHECK_HEADERS([sys/acl.h], [acl_libs="-lacl"]) > -AC_SUBST([ACL_LIBS], [$acl_libs]) > + AH_TEMPLATE(HAVE_LIBACL, [Define to 1 if you have libacl installed.]) > + AC_CHECK_LIB([acl], [acl_init], [acl_libs="-lacl"]) > + AC_SUBST([ACL_LIBS], [$acl_libs]) > ]) The acl1.c ifdefs around HAVE_SYS_ACL_H, we should make use of HAVE_LIBACL there instead otherwise it's still broken, right? Also we should do something as AC_DEFINE(HAVE_LIBACL, ...) in the AC_CHECK_LIB() and we may also drop the header check. I guess that we should do something as: AC_CHECK_LIB([acl], [acl_init], [AC_DEFINE(HAVE_LIBACL, 1, "Define to 1 if you have libacl installed"), AC_SUBST(ACL_LIBS, "-lacl)]) Per all libraries, so that we would end up with HAVE_LIBACL to be used in #ifdefs in C code and with ACL_LIBS to be used in Makefiles. We have to do both to avoid compilation failures. We would have to keep a few check for headers though, since we do have a few checks for HAVE_FOO_H in the include/lapi/ headers that turn on/off fallback definitions. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz