public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2 02/13] thp: ensure THP/hugetlbfs is available
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:20:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171127162000.GA20047@rei.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171114155929.24237-3-punit.agrawal@arm.com>

Hi!
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/thp/thp01.c b/testcases/kernel/mem/thp/thp01.c
> index 2f2bb2bdb..939c01b98 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/mem/thp/thp01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/thp/thp01.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,9 @@ static void setup(void)
>  	int i;
>  	long arg_len, arg_count;
>  
> +	if (access(PATH_THP, F_OK) == -1)
> +		tst_brk(TCONF, "THP not enabled in kernel?");
> +
>  	bst = SAFE_MMAP(NULL, sizeof(*bst),
>  			   PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
>  			   MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);

I do not get what is the problem with this test on a machine without
hugepages or transparent hugepages. The test just tries to execute true
with excessively large array of command line arguments, if that fails
without hugepages it's a kernel bug.

> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/thp/thp02.c b/testcases/kernel/mem/thp/thp02.c
> index acc70e215..6502210e5 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/mem/thp/thp02.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/thp/thp02.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ static void setup(void)
>  	if (access(PATH_THP, F_OK) == -1)
>  		tst_brk(TCONF, "THP not enabled in kernel?");
>  
> +	check_hugepage();
> +
>  	ps = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
>  	hps = SAFE_READ_MEMINFO("Hugepagesize:") * 1024;
>  	size = hps * 4;
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/thp/thp03.c b/testcases/kernel/mem/thp/thp03.c
> index 19db44944..c6062505f 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/mem/thp/thp03.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/thp/thp03.c
> @@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ static void setup(void)
>  	if (access(PATH_THP, F_OK) == -1)
>  		tst_brk(TCONF, "THP not enabled in kernel?");
>  
> +	check_hugepage();
> +
>  	hugepage_size = SAFE_READ_MEMINFO("Hugepagesize:") * KB;
>  	unaligned_size = hugepage_size * 4 - 1;
>  	page_size = SAFE_SYSCONF(_SC_PAGESIZE);

Does this two fail on an attempt to find "Hugepagesize:" in meminfo
file? Otherwise I do not see how they can fail.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-27 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-14 15:59 [LTP] [PATCH v2 00/13] Collection of fixes Punit Agrawal
2017-11-14 15:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 01/13] Move check_hugepage() helper to mem/lib Punit Agrawal
2017-11-14 15:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 02/13] thp: ensure THP/hugetlbfs is available Punit Agrawal
2017-11-27 16:20   ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2017-11-27 16:59     ` Punit Agrawal
2017-11-29 12:44       ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-11-29 13:29         ` Punit Agrawal
2017-11-29 14:34           ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-11-14 15:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 03/13] hugeshmctl01: Convert to LTP synchronisation primitives Punit Agrawal
2017-11-27 16:52   ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-11-27 17:34     ` Punit Agrawal
2017-11-14 15:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 04/13] hugeshmctl01: Fix warning about signed/unsigned comparison Punit Agrawal
2017-11-14 15:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 05/13] hugeshmctl02: Fix allocation size for odd number of hugepages Punit Agrawal
2017-11-14 15:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 06/13] hugeshmget02: add missing SHM_HUGETLB flag on segment creation Punit Agrawal
2017-11-14 15:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 07/13] sigwaitinfo01: fix race between sending and dequeueing RT signals Punit Agrawal
2017-11-14 15:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 08/13] sigwaitinfo01: catch SEGV and report success for bad_address2 testcase Punit Agrawal
2017-11-29 10:29   ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-11-29 13:25     ` Punit Agrawal
2017-11-29 15:33       ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-11-14 15:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 09/13] syscalls/mount03: Copy setuid_test to execute instead of 'TEST FILE' Punit Agrawal
2017-11-29 13:20   ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-11-29 16:50     ` Punit Agrawal
2017-11-30 12:21       ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-11-30 12:56         ` Punit Agrawal
2017-11-30 13:17           ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-11-30 15:56             ` Punit Agrawal
2017-11-14 15:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 10/13] getdtablesize01: Handle ENFILE errno Punit Agrawal
2017-11-30 13:12   ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-11-30 16:06     ` Punit Agrawal
2017-11-30 16:20       ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-11-30 16:41         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-12-01 13:38           ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-12-01 15:30             ` Punit Agrawal
2017-11-14 15:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 11/13] perf_event_open: Handle absence of PMU gracefully Punit Agrawal
2017-11-14 15:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 12/13] hotplug/cpu_hotplug: Repopulate cgroup:cpusets after testing hotplug Punit Agrawal
2017-11-30 13:58   ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-12-01 16:00     ` Punit Agrawal
2017-11-14 15:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 13/13] hotplug/cpu_hotplug: Remove bashism disown from kill_pid() Punit Agrawal
2017-11-21 16:15 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 00/13] Collection of fixes Punit Agrawal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171127162000.GA20047@rei.lan \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox