public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LTP] 3239b6f29b ("KEYS: return full count in keyring_read() if buffer is too small"): ltp.keyctl06.fail
       [not found] <20171201024012.wsq3xnsbbdqwxwp2@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
@ 2017-12-01 19:21 ` Eric Biggers
  2017-12-05  9:43   ` Richard Palethorpe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Biggers @ 2017-12-01 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 10:40:12AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> 
> We noticed LTP keyctl06 test regression in
> 
> commit: 3239b6f29bdfb4b0a2ba59df995fc9e6f4df7f1f ("KEYS: return full count in keyring_read() if buffer is too small")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> 
> on test machine: 48 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz with 64G memory
> with following parameters:
> 
> 	disk: 1HDD
> 	fs: ext4
> 	test: syscalls_part2
> 
> test-description: The LTP testsuite contains a collection of tools for testing the Linux kernel and related features.
> test-url: http://linux-test-project.github.io/
> 
> To reproduce:
> 
>          git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
>          cd lkp-tests
>          bin/lkp install job.yaml  # job file is attached in this email
>          bin/lkp run     job.yaml
> 
> testcase/path_params/tbox_group/run: ltp/1HDD-ext4-syscalls_part2/ivb44
> 

Did this include LTP commit f21703fe45d3 ("syscalls/keyctl06: update to test for
follow-on fix")?  It would be really helpful if these reports would include the
LTP commit that was used.

Eric

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [LTP] 3239b6f29b ("KEYS: return full count in keyring_read() if buffer is too small"): ltp.keyctl06.fail
  2017-12-01 19:21 ` [LTP] 3239b6f29b ("KEYS: return full count in keyring_read() if buffer is too small"): ltp.keyctl06.fail Eric Biggers
@ 2017-12-05  9:43   ` Richard Palethorpe
  2017-12-05 18:10     ` Eric Biggers
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Palethorpe @ 2017-12-05  9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

Hello,

Eric Biggers writes:

> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 10:40:12AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>> 
>> We noticed LTP keyctl06 test regression in
>> 
>> commit: 3239b6f29bdfb4b0a2ba59df995fc9e6f4df7f1f ("KEYS: return full count in keyring_read() if buffer is too small")
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>> 
>> on test machine: 48 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz with 64G memory
>> with following parameters:
>> 
>> 	disk: 1HDD
>> 	fs: ext4
>> 	test: syscalls_part2
>> 
>> test-description: The LTP testsuite contains a collection of tools for testing the Linux kernel and related features.
>> test-url: http://linux-test-project.github.io/
>> 
>> To reproduce:
>> 
>>          git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
>>          cd lkp-tests
>>          bin/lkp install job.yaml  # job file is attached in this email
>>          bin/lkp run     job.yaml
>> 
>> testcase/path_params/tbox_group/run: ltp/1HDD-ext4-syscalls_part2/ivb44
>> 
>
> Did this include LTP commit f21703fe45d3 ("syscalls/keyctl06: update to test for
> follow-on fix")?  It would be really helpful if these reports would include the
> LTP commit that was used.
>
> Eric

We are getting the following result, even with the follow up patch:

keyctl06.c:68: FAIL: KEYCTL_READ returned 4 but expected 8

This is with SUSE SLE15 kernel 4.12.14. I haven't had chance to
investigate it yet.

-- 
Thank you,
Richard.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [LTP] 3239b6f29b ("KEYS: return full count in keyring_read() if buffer is too small"): ltp.keyctl06.fail
  2017-12-05  9:43   ` Richard Palethorpe
@ 2017-12-05 18:10     ` Eric Biggers
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Biggers @ 2017-12-05 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:43:08AM +0100, Richard Palethorpe wrote:
> 
> We are getting the following result, even with the follow up patch:
> 
> keyctl06.c:68: FAIL: KEYCTL_READ returned 4 but expected 8
> 
> This is with SUSE SLE15 kernel 4.12.14. I haven't had chance to
> investigate it yet.
> 

Does the kernel include *both* fixes the test tests for now?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-12-05 18:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20171201024012.wsq3xnsbbdqwxwp2@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [LTP] 3239b6f29b ("KEYS: return full count in keyring_read() if buffer is too small"): ltp.keyctl06.fail Eric Biggers
2017-12-05  9:43   ` Richard Palethorpe
2017-12-05 18:10     ` Eric Biggers

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox