public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [RFC PATCH 0/2] Allow to compile on archs without atomic support
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 01:02:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180109000241.GA20748@x230> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <754978231.4598218.1515424172751.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>

Hi Jan,

thanks for your comments.

> > I know as this has quite low priority (benefit only people with old
> > compilers and archs), but why not to give a chance them to have at least
> > something from LTP?

> Compiler shouldn't matter, we have fallbacks.
> So I assume this concerns only some architectures we currently don't support.
Yes.

> > Quite a lot of tests it's working, affected are only tests using threads
> > on new API or fuzzy synchronization and counting results for tests using
> > new api.

> What if we made general implementation with some locking? It would be
> slower, but I think we don't use atomics that much for it to matter.
Makes sense. I'll implement it.


> Regards,
> Jan


Kind regards,
Petr

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-09  0:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-04 20:42 [LTP] [RFC PATCH 0/2] Allow to compile on archs without atomic support Petr Vorel
2018-01-04 20:42 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH 1/2] tst_atomic.h: " Petr Vorel
2018-01-04 20:42 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH 2/2] lib/tst_test.c: Don't print results on archs without atomic Petr Vorel
2018-01-08 15:09 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH 0/2] Allow to compile on archs without atomic support Jan Stancek
2018-01-09  0:02   ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2018-01-10 11:09   ` Cyril Hrubis
2018-01-10 11:17     ` Petr Vorel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180109000241.GA20748@x230 \
    --to=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox