From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 13:04:14 +0100
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] mallocstress: extend test time on arm
In-Reply-To: <2012939043.6317537.1520592935484.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
References: <981e2a8523db8616a4ed442635a493928376489d.1520589632.git.jstancek@redhat.com>
 <20180309104146.GA28698@rei>
 <2012939043.6317537.1520592935484.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20180309120414.GD24656@rei>
List-Id: <ltp.lists.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ltp@lists.linux.it

Hi!
> Just wanted to go with minimal impact on other arches (since they worked
> OK so far as I'm aware). I don't have strong opinion either way,
> I can make the timeout unconditional.

Given that the test seems to take 4m on successful run 5m timeout seems
to be a bit too strict to me. We are not primarily benchmarking the
kernel, so these timeouts are better to be set to be double of the
expecte runtime.

Also I like to avoid #ifdefs whenever possible.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz