public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] lib/tst_device.c: Make sure all loop deivces fot test are detached
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 14:33:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180912123332.GC463@rei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1536832085-8071-1-git-send-email-yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>

Hi!
> Running statx05 by runltp without -b option every time attached a loop
> device but didn't detach it, as below:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ...
> tst_device.c:230: INFO: Using test device LTP_DEV='/dev/loop0'
> tst_device.c:268: INFO: Skipping $LTP_DEV size 256MB, requested size 512MB
> tst_device.c:83: INFO: Found free device '/dev/loop1'
> tst_mkfs.c:83: INFO: Formatting /dev/loop1 with ext4 opts='' extra opts='-O encrypt'
> ...
> NAME       SIZELIMIT OFFSET AUTOCLEAR RO BACK-FILE                                         DIO
> /dev/loop1         0      0         0  0 /tmp/ltp-gsrcFAkGpZ/Wka3bp/test_dev.img (deleted)   0
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> runltp created a block device with default 256M size by attaching a free loop
> device and set LTP_DEV variable, but statx05 needed a 512M block device, so
> tst_acquire_device__() in setup skipped the $LTP_DEV device and created another
> block device with 512M size by attaching another free loop device.  Unfortunately,
> tst_release_device() in cleanup cannot detach the 512M block device due to the
> defined LTP_DEV.

Btw his has been fixed for statx since:

commit e583eacf3c9781116c19dec4c7e8c0aa4ed01ed5
Author: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Date:   Tue Sep 11 17:27:43 2018 +0200

    syscalls/statx05: Fix test on ppc64le


But yes apart from that the test library is still broken.

> We should just skip the detach in tst_release_device() when LTP_DEV variable is
> set and device_acquired flag is not set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  lib/tst_device.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/tst_device.c b/lib/tst_device.c
> index 463743443..23c99dba2 100644
> --- a/lib/tst_device.c
> +++ b/lib/tst_device.c
> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ int tst_release_device(const char *dev)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (getenv("LTP_DEV"))
> +	if (getenv("LTP_DEV") && !device_acquired)
>  		return 0;

I guess that this really should be just:

	if (!device_acquired)
		return 0;

I will double check and test it later today.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-12 12:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-13  9:48 [LTP] [PATCH] lib/tst_device.c: Make sure all loop deivces fot test are detached Xiao Yang
2018-09-12 12:33 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2018-09-13  4:17   ` Xiao Yang
2018-09-13  5:22   ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Xiao Yang
2018-09-13 15:54     ` Cyril Hrubis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180912123332.GC463@rei \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox