From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/4] Testing statx syscall Timestamp fields
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:17:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181004091743.GA18007@rei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180904080152.22488-1-subash@zilogic.com>
Hi!
Looking at these tests they are almost identical, it would make much
sense to keep them in a single test, so that we will format and mount
the device only once at the start of the test, then we can execute the
four different test scenarios. That should save at least half of a
minute of a runtime. What do you think?
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-04 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-04 8:01 [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/4] Testing statx syscall Timestamp fields subash
2018-10-04 9:17 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-09-10 13:19 subash
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181004091743.GA18007@rei \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox