public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] rt_sigqueueinfo: Invalid argument
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 14:45:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181008124541.GB13162@rei.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+G9fYtxvj0j6BVVZ_YoBkZn6m6ZpEMmDjBjwqY7uvpgMbNQbQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi!
> rt_sigqueueinfo01 failed on all device (x86_64, i386, arm / arm64)
> started failing from Linux version 4.19.0-rc6-next-20181004.
> Do you see this failure at your end?
>
> rt_sigqueueinfo01: rt_sigqueueinfo: Invalid argument
> rt_sigqueueinfo01: rt_sigqueueinfo: Invalid argument
> rt_sigqueueinfo01    1  TFAIL  :  rt_sigqueueinfo01.c:97: Test Failed
> rt_sigqueueinfo01    0  TINFO  :  Failed to record test working dir
> rt_sigqueueinfo01    1  TFAIL  :  rt_sigqueueinfo01.c:97: Test Failed
> rt_sigqueueinfo01    0  TINFO  :  Failed to record test working dir
> rt_sigqueueinfo01    2  TFAIL  :  rt_sigqueueinfo01.c:97: Test Failed
> 
> Full log  details.
> https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/451548#L10339

I do not recall seeing this test to fail.

However the test is old messy code, one thing that I guess may happen is
that there is random garbage in the siginfo_t structure we pass to the
syscall and in you case you were unlucky enough so that kernel rejects
the value, but that is just wild guess.

Btw, I've opened an issue to clean up the test in:

https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues/404

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-08 12:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-08 12:26 [LTP] rt_sigqueueinfo: Invalid argument Naresh Kamboju
2018-10-08 12:45 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2018-10-08 13:06   ` Jan Stancek
2018-10-08 14:52     ` Naresh Kamboju
2018-10-08 15:52       ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181008124541.GB13162@rei.lan \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox