From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 20:01:34 +0100
Subject: [LTP] [RFC PATCH 0/2] Cleanup runtests containing duplicate
	definitions
In-Reply-To: <863155656.69419841.1541430302026.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
References: <20181015201819.10868-1-pvorel@suse.cz>
 <20181105114301.GA3591@dell5510>
 <CAEemH2fxHBmWmuj314ZdB+E2i2wXBtOg40SrSgt2Vxtqcns=0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <863155656.69419841.1541430302026.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20181105190134.GA12879@dell5510>
List-Id: <ltp.lists.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ltp@lists.linux.it

Hi Jan, Li,

> > Jan, did we internal ltp-lite take reference from the ltplite file?

> Probably only at the beginning, when original author of beaker test
> forked ltplite runtest file. I've been using syscalls/other runtest
> files, since those are more up to date.

> > I wanna
> > know how do we customize our internal ltp-lite testcases.

> syscalls + cherry-picked tests from other runtest files.

Is it problematic for you to remove these runtest files?
Hope not, but if yes, please let me know. I'll wait for your ack before removing it.

Kind regards,
Petr