From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 10:43:19 +0100
Subject: [LTP] [RFC PATCH 0/2] Cleanup runtests containing duplicate
	definitions
In-Reply-To: <CAEemH2cndLR3ZkF2MJdc7+SVxtKiYhepj=_fUAstgXH2e8bk7w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20181015201819.10868-1-pvorel@suse.cz>
 <20181105114301.GA3591@dell5510>
 <CAEemH2fxHBmWmuj314ZdB+E2i2wXBtOg40SrSgt2Vxtqcns=0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <863155656.69419841.1541430302026.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
 <20181105190134.GA12879@dell5510>
 <CAEemH2cndLR3ZkF2MJdc7+SVxtKiYhepj=_fUAstgXH2e8bk7w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20181106094319.GA1639@dell5510>
List-Id: <ltp.lists.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ltp@lists.linux.it

Hi Li,
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 3:01 AM, Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:

> > Hi Jan, Li,

> > > > Jan, did we internal ltp-lite take reference from the ltplite file?

> > > Probably only at the beginning, when original author of beaker test
> > > forked ltplite runtest file. I've been using syscalls/other runtest
> > > files, since those are more up to date.

> > > > I wanna
> > > > know how do we customize our internal ltp-lite testcases.

> > > syscalls + cherry-picked tests from other runtest files.

> > Is it problematic for you to remove these runtest files?


> I think we're OK to remove that in upstream.

Thanks for info, pushed.


Kind regards,
Petr