public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] uclinux support?
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 09:56:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181113085615.GD7182@dell5510> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181112142240.GA10234@rei.lan>

Hi,

> > > uClinux support in LTP has been broken for years and nobody seemed to
> > > really care. I even tried to ask if there is someone interesting in
> > > running LTP on uClinux on the uClinux mailing list but it seems that
> > > even the list is basically dead at this point. So for a last year or so
> > > we are slowly getting rid of the uClinux specific bits from the codebase
> > > in order to simplify the LTP maintenance. You are free to step up and
> > > restore uClinux support in LTP if you have time for that but unless that
> > > happens we will continue to stage it out.


> > OK understood, I was right to ask :)

> > I'd like to roll back to a point where it was mostly working, any idea
> > when that would be?

> > I've looked at the history, and tried several commits that seemed to
> > remove uclinux support,
> > but I'm still facing similar errors (I'm now back to 2011....)

> Actually I have no idea. But generally the further back you go the more
> unstable the whole LTP gets. I'm pretty sure you will not be able to
> even compile 10 years old LTP regardless the uClinux enabled or not.

> Looking at the commit logs it looks like last time anything has been
> fixed for uClinux was 2009.

> > A point were a subset worked would be nice, I'd like to run tests
> > involving unwinding and signals.

> You may be better off taking an LTP from 2016 before we added the new
> LTP test library which is about the time we started to remove uClinux
> support, i.e. before commit:

> commit bbdb9f78378c7e038f463efa39d2470e1c51ad54
> Author: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
> Date:   Wed Mar 16 15:53:57 2016 +0100

>     lib: Add new test library API

> And disable tests until it compiles.

FYI LTP compiles under uclibc-ng. Buildroot distribution (which uses glibc,
uclibc-ng and musl) disabled it just for musl [1]. It's tested with their
autobuild service [2] and currently no build reports are for latest release [3].
IMHO it shouldn't be difficult to support musl as well.

[1] https://git.busybox.net/buildroot/tree/package/ltp-testsuite/Config.in
[2] https://buildroot.org/downloads/manual/manual.html#_analyzing_and_fixing_autobuild_failures
[3] http://autobuild.buildroot.net/stats/

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-13  8:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-11 20:23 [LTP] uclinux support? Christophe Lyon
2018-11-12 11:01 ` Cyril Hrubis
2018-11-12 13:47   ` Christophe Lyon
2018-11-12 14:22     ` Cyril Hrubis
2018-11-13  8:56       ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2018-11-13  9:25         ` Christophe Lyon
2018-11-13 14:02           ` Petr Vorel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181113085615.GD7182@dell5510 \
    --to=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox