From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Vorel Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 17:37:02 +0100 Subject: [LTP] with-numa/without-numa option not working ? In-Reply-To: <9a9b8890-5bc0-1123-1ceb-68dedb6e7a5c@linaro.org> References: <9a9b8890-5bc0-1123-1ceb-68dedb6e7a5c@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20181203163701.GA19576@x230> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi Rafael, > Hello, > Daniel has discovered that --with-numa and --without-numa practically > have the same effect, disabling NUMA support. This can be seen when > executing test "migrate_pages03", for example. > In both situations it will display: > tst_test.c:771: CONF: require libnuma >= 2 and it's development packages > config.log shows: > when --with-numa AND when --without-numa are set (or --with-numa=yes or > --with-numa=no): Thanks for your report. I'm the author of numa configure option, I'm aware of it (39a85a1f1 and 4ace68a6b). It was never meant that --with-numa would be working. There was only --without-numa as workaround for systems without numa libraries and devel files. Before it was a dependency for LTP compilation. But I know it's confusing, as it's expected both --with-PACKAGE and--without-PACKAGE are implemented, so I'll fix it => with --with-numa (which will be the default) it will fail to compile. Kind regards, Petr