public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] openposix: Remove _XOPEN_SOURCE in strchr/strcpy/strncpy
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 11:00:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181207100013.GA14165@dell5510> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1544089211-8138-1-git-send-email-yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>

Hi Xiao,

> We have defined _XOPEN_SOURCE to 600 by gcc -D in open_posix_testsuite/CFLAGS,
> So defining _XOPEN_SOURCE to different value in test results in a "_XOPEN_SOURCE
> redefined" warning.

> It seems that all of tests get pass even if _XOPEN_SOURCE is defined to 600
> by default, so remove the duplicate _XOPEN_SOURCE in test.

FYI I also mentioned it in https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/pull/423
but it was ignored.
This is a side effect, that we use mailing list and github pull requests.

I guess _XOPEN_SOURCE 600 is ok.
If _XOPEN_SOURCE 700 is really needed, we can use:
#ifdef _XOPEN_SOURCE
#undef _XOPEN_SOURCE
#endif
#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 700

Kind regards,
Petr

> Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---


>  testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strchr/1-1.c  | 1 -
>  testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strcpy/1-1.c  | 1 -
>  testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strncpy/1-1.c | 1 -
>  testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strncpy/2-1.c | 1 -
>  4 files changed, 4 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strchr/1-1.c b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strchr/1-1.c
> index 95eda79..611a64d 100644
> --- a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strchr/1-1.c
> +++ b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strchr/1-1.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
>   *	-Repeat the above all steps for given number of iterations.
>  */

> -#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 700
>  #include <stdio.h>
>  #include <string.h>
>  #include <stdlib.h>
> diff --git a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strcpy/1-1.c b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strcpy/1-1.c
> index 2fdc002..adfbfc3 100644
> --- a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strcpy/1-1.c
> +++ b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strcpy/1-1.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
>   *  -Also compare returned pointer with s2.
>  */

> -#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 700
>  #include <stdio.h>
>  #include <string.h>
>  #include <stdlib.h>
> diff --git a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strncpy/1-1.c b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strncpy/1-1.c
> index 3458015..396bd60 100644
> --- a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strncpy/1-1.c
> +++ b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strncpy/1-1.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
>   *  -Repeat the above steps for given number of iterations.
>  */

> -#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 700
>  #include <stdio.h>
>  #include <string.h>
>  #include <stdlib.h>
> diff --git a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strncpy/2-1.c b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strncpy/2-1.c
> index a7761c5..2a20872 100644
> --- a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strncpy/2-1.c
> +++ b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strncpy/2-1.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
>   *  -Repeat the above steps for given number of iterations.
>  */

> -#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 700
>  #include <stdio.h>
>  #include <string.h>
>  #include <stdlib.h>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-07 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-06  9:40 [LTP] [PATCH] openposix: Remove _XOPEN_SOURCE in strchr/strcpy/strncpy Xiao Yang
2018-12-06 14:26 ` Cyril Hrubis
2018-12-07 10:00 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2018-12-09 20:27   ` Enji Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181207100013.GA14165@dell5510 \
    --to=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox