From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:32:52 +0100
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2 3/3] crypto/crypto_user01.c: new test for
 information leak bug
In-Reply-To: <20181211060317.18698-4-ebiggers@kernel.org>
References: <20181211060317.18698-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
 <20181211060317.18698-4-ebiggers@kernel.org>
Message-ID: <20181211123251.GA27346@rei>
List-Id: <ltp.lists.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ltp@lists.linux.it

Hi!
> --- a/runtest/crypto
> +++ b/runtest/crypto
> @@ -1 +1,2 @@
>  pcrypt_aead01 pcrypt_aead01
> +crypto_user01 crypto_user01
> diff --git a/runtest/cve b/runtest/cve
> index c4ba74186..78a5d8db2 100644
> --- a/runtest/cve
> +++ b/runtest/cve
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ cve-2011-0999 thp01 -I 120
>  cve-2011-2183 ksm05 -I 10
>  cve-2011-2496 vma03
>  cve-2012-0957 uname04
> +cve-2013-2547 crypto_user01
>  cve-2014-0196 cve-2014-0196
>  cve-2015-0235 gethostbyname_r01
>  cve-2015-7550 keyctl02
> @@ -36,3 +37,4 @@ cve-2017-17053 cve-2017-17053
>  cve-2017-18075 pcrypt_aead01
>  cve-2018-5803 sctp_big_chunk
>  cve-2018-1000001 realpath01
> +cve-2018-19854 crypto_user01

Does it really make sense to run this test twice just under different
name?

BTW: I'm working on test tags and metadata patches that would make
failed tests print list of CVEs and kernel commits that fixed them on a
failure and also under the -h help switch, which should fix this once
for all.

See:

http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2018-November/009895.html
http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2018-November/010118.html

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz