[LTP] [PATCH] openposix/strncpy1-1: Fix compiler errors/warnings

[Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>]

Hi!
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  .../conformance/interfaces/strncpy/1-1.c           |   10 +++++++---
>  testcases/open_posix_testsuite/include/posixtest.h |    2 ++
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strncpy/1-1.c b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strncpy/1-1.c
> index 396bd60..7006b5f 100644
> --- a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strncpy/1-1.c
> +++ b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strncpy/1-1.c
> @@ -61,10 +61,14 @@ int main(void)
>          sample_str_1 = random_string(i);
>          num_bytes = rand() % i;
>  
> -        #pragma GCC diagnostic push
> -        #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-truncation"
> +	#if GCC_VERSION >= 80100
> +	# pragma GCC diagnostic push
> +	# pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-truncation"
> +	#endif
>          ret_str = strncpy(sample_str_2, sample_str_1, num_bytes);
> -        #pragma GCC diagnostic pop
> +	#if GCC_VERSION >= 80100
> +	# pragma GCC diagnostic pop
> +	#endif

That looks even more silly than the original. I do not think that it's
reasonable to mess up the code that bad only to surpress a single
warning.

So what abour removing the pragmas entirely?

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz