From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:25:26 +0100
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2] syscalls: add syscall syncfs test
In-Reply-To: <20190215132251.GB26339@rei>
References: <1550215053-6795-1-git-send-email-sumit.garg@linaro.org>
 <5C667060.7020405@cn.fujitsu.com>
 <CAFA6WYO8qg79rQ-qwU3i6FpfNRQhiTNXzGHtDsJ6FpTty6W77g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190215121611.GA14270@rei>
 <CAFA6WYOF1Kh1rspdiPgne9q4jUQsMW4p5BN_J4evcsr9O-KD1Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190215132251.GB26339@rei>
Message-ID: <20190215132526.GC26339@rei>
List-Id: <ltp.lists.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ltp@lists.linux.it

Hi!
> > Thanks for the pointers. IIUC, you are referring to following change:
> > 
> > -       TEST(syncfs(fd));
> > +       TEST(tst_syscall(__NR_syncfs, fd));
> > 
> > If yes, then I will incorporate it.
> 
> The most complete solution is configure check + fallback definition.
> 
> Have a look at:
> 
> include/lapi/execveat.h
> m4/ltp-execveat.m4
> configure.ac

And then you have to also check for the return value to exit the test
with TCONF on missing kernel support, you will most likely get EINVAL in
that case as the syscall number is not known.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz