From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Hrubis Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 10:42:28 +0100 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v1] rt_sigpending02: reuse code from sigpending02 In-Reply-To: <64d5553d-ac2d-fd8a-03d1-7cd05d1deeeb@google.com> References: <20190308163832.212631-1-maennich@google.com> <64d5553d-ac2d-fd8a-03d1-7cd05d1deeeb@google.com> Message-ID: <20190313094228.GA24870@rei.lan> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi! > One downside with this multiplexed approach is that we then don't have > an entry in the testcases/kernel/syscalls/ directory for all syscalls > which can cause some confusion, but that could perhaps be addressed by > adding symlinks for the missing ones. Actually my long term plan is to include metadata in the testcases which would, among other things, describe which syscalls/libcalls the tests is excercising and I want this information to be propagated to the test runner as well, so instead of relying on one binary file per syscall we would have proper metadata describing the tests. And the biggest problem here is that it looks that there is very little interest in investing time into this approach. I've send a (quick and dirty) RFC patch that tried to show a direction for such work, but nearly nobody replied to it, so I postponed the work a bit. See: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/list/?series=78493 -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz