public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [RFC PATCH 0/1] Fix return value checks for posix apis
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 11:49:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190520094949.GA25405@rei.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190520041730.28238-1-sspatil@android.com>

Hi!
> This is an RFC patch to demonstrate that most of the pthread_* calls
> in the open_posix_testsuite seem to be doing the return value checks
> incorrectly. Most posix_* apis return positive errno on failure and 0 on
> success.

This is unfortunately common misconception, also I guess you meant
pthread_* APIs here.

> PATCH 1/1 demonstrates the fixes needed for pthread_sigmask/6-1 for
> example. This pattern is fairly widespread in open_posix_testsuite.
> 
> After going through the documentation in the project, I wasn't sure if I
> tested this correctly. After building, I tried the following
> 
> $ cd testcases/open_posix_testsuite
> $ ./bin/run_tesit.sh conformance/interfaces/pthread_sigmask pthread_sigmask_6-1.run-test
> 
> ...and that keeps running into test being skipped due to missing file.
> (I do have pthread_sigmask_6-1.run-test in place).

Actually I always just run the binary, so in this case doing
./pthread_sigmask_6-1.run-test should suffice.

> So, consider this build tested only for now. I'd love to know how we can
> test this and if we are still using the testsuite, then I am happy to
> fix rest of the places where its broken.

Sounds good.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-20  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-20  4:17 [LTP] [RFC PATCH 0/1] Fix return value checks for posix apis Sandeep Patil
2019-05-20  4:17 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH 1/1] open_posix_testsuite/pthread_sigmask: fix return value checks Sandeep Patil
2019-05-20  9:53   ` Cyril Hrubis
2019-05-21  4:40     ` Sandeep Patil
2019-05-21 11:46       ` Cyril Hrubis
2019-05-20  9:49 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2019-05-21  4:41   ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH 0/1] Fix return value checks for posix apis Sandeep Patil
2019-05-21 11:48     ` Cyril Hrubis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190520094949.GA25405@rei.lan \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox