From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Vorel Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 12:57:29 +0200 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] runtest/syscalls: add set_mempolicy* In-Reply-To: <5D688449.3080906@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1566987255-3010-1-git-send-email-xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> <20190829203826.GA5711@dell5510> <5D688449.3080906@cn.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: <20190830105729.GC9330@dell5510> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi Yang, > On 2019/08/30 4:38, Petr Vorel wrote: > > Hi, > > > Since commit 55ee8a5ad ("syscalls: Add set_mempolicy numa tests"), > > > these cases have been added into runtests/numa, but forget to add it > > > in runtest/syscalls. > > > Signed-off-by: Yang Xu > > Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel > > > --- > > > runtest/syscalls | 5 +++++ > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > diff --git a/runtest/syscalls b/runtest/syscalls > > > index c41ba2a0d..1694ef147 100644 > > > --- a/runtest/syscalls > > > +++ b/runtest/syscalls > > > @@ -1177,6 +1177,11 @@ setitimer01 setitimer01 > > > setitimer02 setitimer02 > > > setitimer03 setitimer03 > > > +set_mempolicy01 set_mempolicy01 > > > +set_mempolicy02 set_mempolicy02 > > > +set_mempolicy03 set_mempolicy03 > > > +set_mempolicy04 set_mempolicy04 > > > + > > > setns01 setns01 > > > setns02 setns02 > > Wouldn't be better to move all NUMA tests out of syscalls? > > Syscalls are big already. > Hi Petr, > all NUMA tests actually verify the functionality of syscalls(move_pages(2), > set_mempolicy(2), etc) > so I think that they can be added into syscalls group. > PS: If someone want to run syscalls from LTP as many as possible, they just > need to run syscalls group directly. OK, ack. PS: I'd prefer syscalls to be just includes of other runtests (otherwise we keep forgetting to add testcases), but that won't happen until docparse & new runner are released. Kind regards, Petr