public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] read_all: retry to queue work for any worker
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 15:56:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191009135656.GD7561@rei.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26d555b1d9deddb5a6f0a93a7c7d3b00e8abc1ff.1570616598.git.jstancek@redhat.com>

Hi!
> +static void work_push_retry(int worker, const char *buf)
> +{
> +	int i, ret, worker_min, worker_max;
> +
> +	if (worker < 0) {
> +		/* pick any, try -worker first */
> +		worker_min = worker * (-1);
> +		worker_max = worker_count;
> +	} else {
> +		/* keep trying worker */
> +		worker_min = worker;
> +		worker_max = worker + 1;
> +	}
> +	i = worker_min;
> +
> +	for (;;) {
> +		ret = queue_push(workers[i].q, buf);
> +		if (ret == 1)
> +			break;
> +
> +		if (++i >= worker_max) {
> +			i = worker_min;
> +			usleep(100000);


My only concern is that we sleep for too long here. Maybe we should
start with smaller sleep here and increase it after a while.

Or have you checked that the tests runs as fast as if we had smaller
sleep here?

> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static void stop_workers(void)
>  {
>  	const char stop_code[1] = { '\0' };
> @@ -292,7 +319,7 @@ static void stop_workers(void)
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < worker_count; i++) {
>  		if (workers[i].q)
> -			TST_RETRY_FUNC(queue_push(workers[i].q, stop_code), 1);
> +			work_push_retry(i, stop_code);
>  	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < worker_count; i++) {
> @@ -310,7 +337,7 @@ static void rep_sched_work(const char *path, int rep)
>  	for (i = j = 0; i < rep; i++, j++) {
>  		if (j >= worker_count)
>  			j = 0;
> -		TST_RETRY_FUNC(queue_push(workers[j].q, path), 1);
> +		work_push_retry(-j, path);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-09 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-09 10:29 [LTP] [PATCH] read_all: retry to queue work for any worker Jan Stancek
2019-10-09 13:56 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2019-10-09 14:29   ` Jan Stancek
2019-10-09 14:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Jan Stancek
2019-10-09 15:26   ` Cyril Hrubis
2019-10-11  8:24   ` Li Wang
2019-10-12  5:58     ` Li Wang
2019-10-12  6:17       ` Jan Stancek
2019-10-12  6:35         ` Li Wang
2019-10-12  6:49           ` Jan Stancek
2019-10-12  7:28             ` Li Wang
2019-10-13  7:54               ` Jan Stancek
2019-10-14  6:31                 ` Li Wang
2019-10-15 14:15                   ` Jan Stancek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191009135656.GD7561@rei.lan \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox