public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LTP] [PATCH] acct: fix version check on big endian system
@ 2019-10-10  6:37 Ping Fang
  2019-10-10  6:43 ` Ping Fang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ping Fang @ 2019-10-10  6:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

ac_version = ACCT_VERION | ACCT_BYTEORDER
which is 0x83 (131) on big endian system.

failure output:
tst_kconfig.c:62: INFO: Parsing kernel config
'/boot/config-4.18.0-147.el8.s390x'
tst_test.c:1118: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
tst_kconfig.c:62: INFO: Parsing kernel config
'/boot/config-4.18.0-147.el8.s390x'
acct02.c:239: INFO: Verifying using 'struct acct_v3'
acct02.c:192: INFO: == entry 1 ==
acct02.c:147: INFO: ac_version != 3 (131)
acct02.c:192: INFO: == entry 2 ==
acct02.c:82: INFO: ac_comm != 'acct02_helper' ('acct02')
acct02.c:133: INFO: ac_exitcode != 32768 (0)
acct02.c:141: INFO: ac_ppid != 34501 (34500)
acct02.c:147: INFO: ac_version != 3 (131)
acct02.c:182: FAIL: end of file reached

Signed-off-by: Ping Fang <pifang@redhat.com>
---
 testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
index 7c2a27046..c513b2145 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
@@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ static int verify_acct(void *acc, int elap_time)
 		ret = 1;
 	}
 
-	if (ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version) != 3) {
+	/* In big endian system accout version have a ACCT_BYTEORDER 0x80 flag*/
+	if (ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version) != 3 || ACC_MEMBER_V3(ac_version) != 131) {
 		tst_res(TINFO, "ac_version != 3 (%d)",
 			ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version));
 		ret = 1;
-- 
2.21.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [LTP] [PATCH] acct: fix version check on big endian system
  2019-10-10  6:37 [LTP] [PATCH] acct: fix version check on big endian system Ping Fang
@ 2019-10-10  6:43 ` Ping Fang
  2019-10-10  7:35   ` Jan Stancek
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ping Fang @ 2019-10-10  6:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 02:37:50PM +0800, Ping Fang wrote:
> ac_version = ACCT_VERION | ACCT_BYTEORDER
> which is 0x83 (131) on big endian system.
> 
> failure output:
> tst_kconfig.c:62: INFO: Parsing kernel config
> '/boot/config-4.18.0-147.el8.s390x'
> tst_test.c:1118: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> tst_kconfig.c:62: INFO: Parsing kernel config
> '/boot/config-4.18.0-147.el8.s390x'
> acct02.c:239: INFO: Verifying using 'struct acct_v3'
> acct02.c:192: INFO: == entry 1 ==
> acct02.c:147: INFO: ac_version != 3 (131)
> acct02.c:192: INFO: == entry 2 ==
> acct02.c:82: INFO: ac_comm != 'acct02_helper' ('acct02')
> acct02.c:133: INFO: ac_exitcode != 32768 (0)
> acct02.c:141: INFO: ac_ppid != 34501 (34500)
> acct02.c:147: INFO: ac_version != 3 (131)
> acct02.c:182: FAIL: end of file reached
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ping Fang <pifang@redhat.com>
> ---
>  testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> index 7c2a27046..c513b2145 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> @@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ static int verify_acct(void *acc, int elap_time)
>  		ret = 1;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version) != 3) {
> +	/* In big endian system accout version have a ACCT_BYTEORDER 0x80 flag*/
> +	if (ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version) != 3 || ACC_MEMBER_V3(ac_version) != 131) {
					    ^^ should be &&.
>  		tst_res(TINFO, "ac_version != 3 (%d)",
>  			ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version));
>  		ret = 1;
> -- 
> 2.21.0
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [LTP] [PATCH] acct: fix version check on big endian system
  2019-10-10  6:43 ` Ping Fang
@ 2019-10-10  7:35   ` Jan Stancek
  2019-10-10  8:16     ` Ping Fang
  2019-10-10 11:44     ` Petr Vorel
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jan Stancek @ 2019-10-10  7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp


----- Original Message -----
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 02:37:50PM +0800, Ping Fang wrote:
> > ac_version = ACCT_VERION | ACCT_BYTEORDER
> > which is 0x83 (131) on big endian system.
> > 
> > failure output:
> > tst_kconfig.c:62: INFO: Parsing kernel config
> > '/boot/config-4.18.0-147.el8.s390x'
> > tst_test.c:1118: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> > tst_kconfig.c:62: INFO: Parsing kernel config
> > '/boot/config-4.18.0-147.el8.s390x'
> > acct02.c:239: INFO: Verifying using 'struct acct_v3'
> > acct02.c:192: INFO: == entry 1 ==
> > acct02.c:147: INFO: ac_version != 3 (131)
> > acct02.c:192: INFO: == entry 2 ==
> > acct02.c:82: INFO: ac_comm != 'acct02_helper' ('acct02')
> > acct02.c:133: INFO: ac_exitcode != 32768 (0)
> > acct02.c:141: INFO: ac_ppid != 34501 (34500)
> > acct02.c:147: INFO: ac_version != 3 (131)
> > acct02.c:182: FAIL: end of file reached
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ping Fang <pifang@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> > b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> > index 7c2a27046..c513b2145 100644
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> > @@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ static int verify_acct(void *acc, int elap_time)
> >  		ret = 1;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version) != 3) {
> > +	/* In big endian system accout version have a ACCT_BYTEORDER 0x80 flag*/
> > +	if (ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version) != 3 || ACC_MEMBER_V3(ac_version) != 131)
> > {
> 					    ^^ should be &&.
> >  		tst_res(TINFO, "ac_version != 3 (%d)",
> >  			ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version));
> >  		ret = 1;
> > --
> > 2.21.0

Can we incorporate ACCT_BYTEORDER into that check?

Kernel appears to use it at least since 2.6.12-rc2. We would just need
define it for !HAVE_STRUCT_ACCT_V3 case.

diff --git a/include/lapi/acct.h b/include/lapi/acct.h
index ebd65bbf4df7..112ee48d8aee 100644
--- a/include/lapi/acct.h
+++ b/include/lapi/acct.h
@@ -64,6 +64,13 @@ enum {
        ACORE = 0x08,
        AXSIG = 0x10
 };
+
+# if __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
+# define ACCT_BYTEORDER  0x80
+# elif __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+# define ACCT_BYTEORDER  0x00
+# endif
+
 #endif /* HAVE_STRUCT_ACCT_V3 */
 
 #endif /* LAPI_ACCT_H */
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
index 7c2a270465c5..4d95aafec3e1 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static int verify_acct(void *acc, int elap_time)
                ret = 1;
        }
 
-       if (ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version) != 3) {
+       if (ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version) != (3 | ACCT_BYTEORDER)) {
                tst_res(TINFO, "ac_version != 3 (%d)",
                        ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version));
                ret = 1;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [LTP] [PATCH] acct: fix version check on big endian system
  2019-10-10  7:35   ` Jan Stancek
@ 2019-10-10  8:16     ` Ping Fang
  2019-10-10 11:44     ` Petr Vorel
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ping Fang @ 2019-10-10  8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 03:35:51AM -0400, Jan Stancek wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 02:37:50PM +0800, Ping Fang wrote:
> > > ac_version = ACCT_VERION | ACCT_BYTEORDER
> > > which is 0x83 (131) on big endian system.
> > > 
> > > failure output:
> > > tst_kconfig.c:62: INFO: Parsing kernel config
> > > '/boot/config-4.18.0-147.el8.s390x'
> > > tst_test.c:1118: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> > > tst_kconfig.c:62: INFO: Parsing kernel config
> > > '/boot/config-4.18.0-147.el8.s390x'
> > > acct02.c:239: INFO: Verifying using 'struct acct_v3'
> > > acct02.c:192: INFO: == entry 1 ==
> > > acct02.c:147: INFO: ac_version != 3 (131)
> > > acct02.c:192: INFO: == entry 2 ==
> > > acct02.c:82: INFO: ac_comm != 'acct02_helper' ('acct02')
> > > acct02.c:133: INFO: ac_exitcode != 32768 (0)
> > > acct02.c:141: INFO: ac_ppid != 34501 (34500)
> > > acct02.c:147: INFO: ac_version != 3 (131)
> > > acct02.c:182: FAIL: end of file reached
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ping Fang <pifang@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c | 3 ++-
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> > > b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> > > index 7c2a27046..c513b2145 100644
> > > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> > > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> > > @@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ static int verify_acct(void *acc, int elap_time)
> > >  		ret = 1;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	if (ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version) != 3) {
> > > +	/* In big endian system accout version have a ACCT_BYTEORDER 0x80 flag*/
> > > +	if (ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version) != 3 || ACC_MEMBER_V3(ac_version) != 131)
> > > {
> > 					    ^^ should be &&.
> > >  		tst_res(TINFO, "ac_version != 3 (%d)",
> > >  			ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version));
> > >  		ret = 1;
> > > --
> > > 2.21.0
> 
> Can we incorporate ACCT_BYTEORDER into that check?
Thanks for your advice, I will post v2.
> 
> Kernel appears to use it at least since 2.6.12-rc2. We would just need
> define it for !HAVE_STRUCT_ACCT_V3 case.
> 
> diff --git a/include/lapi/acct.h b/include/lapi/acct.h
> index ebd65bbf4df7..112ee48d8aee 100644
> --- a/include/lapi/acct.h
> +++ b/include/lapi/acct.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,13 @@ enum {
>         ACORE = 0x08,
>         AXSIG = 0x10
>  };
> +
> +# if __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
> +# define ACCT_BYTEORDER  0x80
> +# elif __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
> +# define ACCT_BYTEORDER  0x00
> +# endif
> +
>  #endif /* HAVE_STRUCT_ACCT_V3 */
>  
>  #endif /* LAPI_ACCT_H */
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> index 7c2a270465c5..4d95aafec3e1 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static int verify_acct(void *acc, int elap_time)
>                 ret = 1;
>         }
>  
> -       if (ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version) != 3) {
> +       if (ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version) != (3 | ACCT_BYTEORDER)) {
>                 tst_res(TINFO, "ac_version != 3 (%d)",
>                         ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version));
>                 ret = 1;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [LTP] [PATCH] acct: fix version check on big endian system
  2019-10-10  7:35   ` Jan Stancek
  2019-10-10  8:16     ` Ping Fang
@ 2019-10-10 11:44     ` Petr Vorel
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Petr Vorel @ 2019-10-10 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

Hi Jan,

> Can we incorporate ACCT_BYTEORDER into that check?

> Kernel appears to use it at least since 2.6.12-rc2. We would just need
> define it for !HAVE_STRUCT_ACCT_V3 case.

> diff --git a/include/lapi/acct.h b/include/lapi/acct.h
> index ebd65bbf4df7..112ee48d8aee 100644
> --- a/include/lapi/acct.h
> +++ b/include/lapi/acct.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,13 @@ enum {
>         ACORE = 0x08,
>         AXSIG = 0x10
>  };
> +
> +# if __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
> +# define ACCT_BYTEORDER  0x80
> +# elif __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
> +# define ACCT_BYTEORDER  0x00
> +# endif
> +
>  #endif /* HAVE_STRUCT_ACCT_V3 */

>  #endif /* LAPI_ACCT_H */
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> index 7c2a270465c5..4d95aafec3e1 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static int verify_acct(void *acc, int elap_time)
>                 ret = 1;
>         }

> -       if (ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version) != 3) {
> +       if (ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version) != (3 | ACCT_BYTEORDER)) {
>                 tst_res(TINFO, "ac_version != 3 (%d)",
>                         ACCT_MEMBER_V3(ac_version));
>                 ret = 1;

FYI v2 merged. Sorry not adding your Suggested-by: and Acked-by: tags
(you weren't in Cc: for v2).

Kind regards,
Petr

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-10 11:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-10  6:37 [LTP] [PATCH] acct: fix version check on big endian system Ping Fang
2019-10-10  6:43 ` Ping Fang
2019-10-10  7:35   ` Jan Stancek
2019-10-10  8:16     ` Ping Fang
2019-10-10 11:44     ` Petr Vorel

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox