[LTP] [PATCH V3 08/10] syscalls/move_mount: New tests

Viresh Kumar
2020-02-26T08:23:18Z

On 26-02-20, 08:47, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Your idea is correct, but IMHO it's not good to skip all the tests, which is
> done due
> tst_test.c:1051: BROK: Test 0 haven't reported results!
> if you use tst_res(TBROK ...).

I don't think that is the case. tst_res(TBROK, ...) shouldn't (and
isn't for me) result in skipping of tests.

> tst_brk(TBROK) is used for setup, where you create some resource, which is then
> reused by all test runs, but this preparation fails.

Right, but in my case I can't put all setup stuff in setup() callback
and some of the setup bits stay in run() callback as well.

--
viresh