From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Hrubis Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:20:45 +0200 Subject: [LTP] Purpose of clock_nanosleep2 tests ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20200421092045.GC6577@yuki.lan> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi! > While working on the time64 variants I stumbled upon > testcases/kernel/syscalls/clock_nanosleep2/. > > The commit log says that we were trying to test clock_nanosleep2() > syscall, which I am unable to find, but still this ends up calling the kernel > variant directly for clock_nanosleep() only. > > What am I missing ? Why is this stuff required ? Hmm, I guess that there is no clock_nanosleep2() and the test is a result of a confusion of some kind. Maybe the author just confused clock_nanosleep(2) with clock_nanosleep2(). Looking at clock_nanosleep() tests, there does not seem to be a test for ABSTIME so the best solution would be to move the test to clock_nanosleep directory. What do you think? -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz