From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] pty04: Retry reads when short
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 17:44:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200512154409.GA9960@yuki.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200512142824.13063-2-rpalethorpe@suse.com>
Hi!
> +static ssize_t try_read(int fd, char *data, ssize_t size, ssize_t *n)
> +{
> + ssize_t ret = read(fd, data, size);
> +
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return -(errno != EAGAIN);
> +
> + return (*n += ret) >= size;
> +}
I had to read this piece twice, but I think it's correct.
> static void read_netdev(const struct ldisc_info *ldisc)
> {
> - int rlen, plen = 0;
> + int ret, rlen, plen = 0;
> + ssize_t n;
> char *data;
>
> switch (ldisc->n) {
> @@ -305,20 +316,27 @@ static void read_netdev(const struct ldisc_info *ldisc)
>
> tst_res(TINFO, "Reading from socket %d", sk);
>
> - SAFE_READ(1, sk, data, plen);
> + n = 0;
> + ret = TST_RETRY_FUNC(try_read(sk, data, plen, &n), TST_RETVAL_NOTNULL);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "Read %zd of %d bytes", n, plen);
I wonder if a simple loop without exponential backoff would suffice
here. A least the code would probably be more readable.
> check_data(ldisc, data, plen);
> tst_res(TPASS, "Read netdev 1");
>
> - SAFE_READ(1, sk, data, plen);
> + n = 0;
> + ret = TST_RETRY_FUNC(try_read(sk, data, plen, &n), TST_RETVAL_NOTNULL);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "Read %zd of %d bytes", n, plen);
> check_data(ldisc, data, plen);
> tst_res(TPASS, "Read netdev 2");
>
> TST_CHECKPOINT_WAKE(0);
> - while((rlen = read(sk, data, plen)) > 0)
> + while ((rlen = read(sk, data, plen)) > 0)
> check_data(ldisc, data, rlen);
This should have been part of the previous cleanup patch.
> tst_res(TPASS, "Reading data from netdev interrupted by hangup");
>
> + close(sk);
> tst_free_all();
> }
>
> @@ -357,6 +375,7 @@ static void cleanup(void)
> {
> ioctl(pts, TIOCVHANGUP);
> ioctl(ptmx, TIOCVHANGUP);
> + close(sk);
>
> tst_reap_children();
> }
> --
> 2.26.1
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-12 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-12 14:28 [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] pty04: Remove unnecessary volatile and style fix Richard Palethorpe
2020-05-12 14:28 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] pty04: Retry reads when short Richard Palethorpe
2020-05-12 15:44 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2020-05-12 15:49 ` Petr Vorel
2020-05-12 19:44 ` Jan Stancek
2020-05-13 8:23 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] pty04: Remove unnecessary volatile and style fix Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200512154409.GA9960@yuki.lan \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox