* [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] pty04: Remove unnecessary volatile and style fix @ 2020-05-12 14:28 Richard Palethorpe 2020-05-12 14:28 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] pty04: Retry reads when short Richard Palethorpe 2020-05-13 8:23 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] pty04: Remove unnecessary volatile and style fix Petr Vorel 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Richard Palethorpe @ 2020-05-12 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ltp Signed-off-by: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com> --- testcases/kernel/pty/pty04.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/testcases/kernel/pty/pty04.c b/testcases/kernel/pty/pty04.c index 252babe92..bfda08b2b 100644 --- a/testcases/kernel/pty/pty04.c +++ b/testcases/kernel/pty/pty04.c @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static struct ldisc_info ldiscs[] = { {N_SLCAN, "N_SLCAN", CAN_MTU}, }; -static volatile int ptmx, pts, sk, mtu, no_check; +static int ptmx, pts, sk, mtu, no_check; static int set_ldisc(int tty, const struct ldisc_info *ldisc) { @@ -173,13 +173,15 @@ static void write_pty(const struct ldisc_info *ldisc) written = 0; - ret = TST_RETRY_FUNC(try_write(ptmx, data, len, &written), TST_RETVAL_NOTNULL); + ret = TST_RETRY_FUNC(try_write(ptmx, data, len, &written), + TST_RETVAL_NOTNULL); if (ret < 0) tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "Failed 1st write to PTY"); tst_res(TPASS, "Wrote PTY 1"); written = 0; - ret = TST_RETRY_FUNC(try_write(ptmx, data, len, &written), TST_RETVAL_NOTNULL); + ret = TST_RETRY_FUNC(try_write(ptmx, data, len, &written), + TST_RETVAL_NOTNULL); if (ret < 0) tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "Failed 2nd write to PTY"); -- 2.26.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] pty04: Retry reads when short 2020-05-12 14:28 [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] pty04: Remove unnecessary volatile and style fix Richard Palethorpe @ 2020-05-12 14:28 ` Richard Palethorpe 2020-05-12 15:44 ` Cyril Hrubis 2020-05-12 15:49 ` Petr Vorel 2020-05-13 8:23 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] pty04: Remove unnecessary volatile and style fix Petr Vorel 1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Richard Palethorpe @ 2020-05-12 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ltp Even though reads are blocking and packets are flipped into the netdevice buffer whole, it seems read may return before a full packet is read into user land. Retrying read should prevent timeouts and read failures on some machines. Signed-off-by: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com> Reported-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> Cc: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> --- NOTE: When running this test repeatedly and in parallel; strange things still happen, see: https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues/674#issuecomment-625181783 However this hopefully will fix the timeout issues and read failures reported by some testers. testcases/kernel/pty/pty04.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/testcases/kernel/pty/pty04.c b/testcases/kernel/pty/pty04.c index bfda08b2b..9b2911421 100644 --- a/testcases/kernel/pty/pty04.c +++ b/testcases/kernel/pty/pty04.c @@ -288,9 +288,20 @@ static void check_data(const struct ldisc_info *ldisc, tst_res(TINFO, "Will continue test without data checking"); } +static ssize_t try_read(int fd, char *data, ssize_t size, ssize_t *n) +{ + ssize_t ret = read(fd, data, size); + + if (ret < 0) + return -(errno != EAGAIN); + + return (*n += ret) >= size; +} + static void read_netdev(const struct ldisc_info *ldisc) { - int rlen, plen = 0; + int ret, rlen, plen = 0; + ssize_t n; char *data; switch (ldisc->n) { @@ -305,20 +316,27 @@ static void read_netdev(const struct ldisc_info *ldisc) tst_res(TINFO, "Reading from socket %d", sk); - SAFE_READ(1, sk, data, plen); + n = 0; + ret = TST_RETRY_FUNC(try_read(sk, data, plen, &n), TST_RETVAL_NOTNULL); + if (ret < 0) + tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "Read %zd of %d bytes", n, plen); check_data(ldisc, data, plen); tst_res(TPASS, "Read netdev 1"); - SAFE_READ(1, sk, data, plen); + n = 0; + ret = TST_RETRY_FUNC(try_read(sk, data, plen, &n), TST_RETVAL_NOTNULL); + if (ret < 0) + tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "Read %zd of %d bytes", n, plen); check_data(ldisc, data, plen); tst_res(TPASS, "Read netdev 2"); TST_CHECKPOINT_WAKE(0); - while((rlen = read(sk, data, plen)) > 0) + while ((rlen = read(sk, data, plen)) > 0) check_data(ldisc, data, rlen); tst_res(TPASS, "Reading data from netdev interrupted by hangup"); + close(sk); tst_free_all(); } @@ -357,6 +375,7 @@ static void cleanup(void) { ioctl(pts, TIOCVHANGUP); ioctl(ptmx, TIOCVHANGUP); + close(sk); tst_reap_children(); } -- 2.26.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] pty04: Retry reads when short 2020-05-12 14:28 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] pty04: Retry reads when short Richard Palethorpe @ 2020-05-12 15:44 ` Cyril Hrubis 2020-05-12 15:49 ` Petr Vorel 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Cyril Hrubis @ 2020-05-12 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ltp Hi! > +static ssize_t try_read(int fd, char *data, ssize_t size, ssize_t *n) > +{ > + ssize_t ret = read(fd, data, size); > + > + if (ret < 0) > + return -(errno != EAGAIN); > + > + return (*n += ret) >= size; > +} I had to read this piece twice, but I think it's correct. > static void read_netdev(const struct ldisc_info *ldisc) > { > - int rlen, plen = 0; > + int ret, rlen, plen = 0; > + ssize_t n; > char *data; > > switch (ldisc->n) { > @@ -305,20 +316,27 @@ static void read_netdev(const struct ldisc_info *ldisc) > > tst_res(TINFO, "Reading from socket %d", sk); > > - SAFE_READ(1, sk, data, plen); > + n = 0; > + ret = TST_RETRY_FUNC(try_read(sk, data, plen, &n), TST_RETVAL_NOTNULL); > + if (ret < 0) > + tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "Read %zd of %d bytes", n, plen); I wonder if a simple loop without exponential backoff would suffice here. A least the code would probably be more readable. > check_data(ldisc, data, plen); > tst_res(TPASS, "Read netdev 1"); > > - SAFE_READ(1, sk, data, plen); > + n = 0; > + ret = TST_RETRY_FUNC(try_read(sk, data, plen, &n), TST_RETVAL_NOTNULL); > + if (ret < 0) > + tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "Read %zd of %d bytes", n, plen); > check_data(ldisc, data, plen); > tst_res(TPASS, "Read netdev 2"); > > TST_CHECKPOINT_WAKE(0); > - while((rlen = read(sk, data, plen)) > 0) > + while ((rlen = read(sk, data, plen)) > 0) > check_data(ldisc, data, rlen); This should have been part of the previous cleanup patch. > tst_res(TPASS, "Reading data from netdev interrupted by hangup"); > > + close(sk); > tst_free_all(); > } > > @@ -357,6 +375,7 @@ static void cleanup(void) > { > ioctl(pts, TIOCVHANGUP); > ioctl(ptmx, TIOCVHANGUP); > + close(sk); > > tst_reap_children(); > } > -- > 2.26.1 > > > -- > Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] pty04: Retry reads when short 2020-05-12 14:28 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] pty04: Retry reads when short Richard Palethorpe 2020-05-12 15:44 ` Cyril Hrubis @ 2020-05-12 15:49 ` Petr Vorel 2020-05-12 19:44 ` Jan Stancek 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Petr Vorel @ 2020-05-12 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ltp Hi Richard, > Even though reads are blocking and packets are flipped into the netdevice > buffer whole, it seems read may return before a full packet is read into user > land. Retrying read should prevent timeouts and read failures on some > machines. > Signed-off-by: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com> > Reported-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> > Cc: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> Thanks for taking care of this. It's still possible to reproduce timeout just with higher -i (-i10), but it's an improvement. Kind regards, Petr ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] pty04: Retry reads when short 2020-05-12 15:49 ` Petr Vorel @ 2020-05-12 19:44 ` Jan Stancek 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Jan Stancek @ 2020-05-12 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ltp ----- Original Message ----- > Hi Richard, > > > Even though reads are blocking and packets are flipped into the netdevice > > buffer whole, it seems read may return before a full packet is read into > > user > > land. Retrying read should prevent timeouts and read failures on some > > machines. > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com> > > Reported-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> > > Cc: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> > > Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> > > Thanks for taking care of this. ACK, I'll update github issue when this runs for a while with recent upstream kernels. > It's still possible to reproduce timeout just with higher -i (-i10), > but it's an improvement. > > Kind regards, > Petr > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] pty04: Remove unnecessary volatile and style fix 2020-05-12 14:28 [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] pty04: Remove unnecessary volatile and style fix Richard Palethorpe 2020-05-12 14:28 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] pty04: Retry reads when short Richard Palethorpe @ 2020-05-13 8:23 ` Petr Vorel 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Petr Vorel @ 2020-05-13 8:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ltp Hi Richard, Merged (with while from 2nd patch). Thanks! Kind regards, Petr ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-13 8:23 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-05-12 14:28 [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] pty04: Remove unnecessary volatile and style fix Richard Palethorpe 2020-05-12 14:28 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] pty04: Retry reads when short Richard Palethorpe 2020-05-12 15:44 ` Cyril Hrubis 2020-05-12 15:49 ` Petr Vorel 2020-05-12 19:44 ` Jan Stancek 2020-05-13 8:23 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] pty04: Remove unnecessary volatile and style fix Petr Vorel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox