From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Vorel Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:48:16 +0200 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2] LIB: Use INTERNAL_LIB for ltp lib In-Reply-To: <5EE09E11.102@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <57a1c19e-d8e5-4389-8565-20e49f144657@G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local> <78176e41-03c4-e75b-594b-20731b2d4dfd@cn.fujitsu.com> <20200610080529.GA19781@dell5510> <5EE09E11.102@cn.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: <20200610104816.GA12808@dell5510> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi Yang, Xu, > Agreed, This patch should focus on replacing LIB with INTERNAL_LIB. +1 merged (with adjusted commit message, added realtime and keeping libdir changes for now). Xu, thank you! > My question about the issue is not important, we can just keep libdir for > now as you want because someone may add dynamic library linking in future. Yep, let's leave it now. I guess for adding LTP into traditional linux distribution (not just have it in QA teams repositories or in embedded distros) LTP libraries would have to be dynamically linked. Also traditional distros would probably install most of LTP binaries outside of /usr/bin, into LTP library path (e.g. /usr/lib64/ltp). Thus I'm for keeping that old comment in include/mk/generic_leaf_target.inc. Kind regards, Petr