From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH V4 5/6] syscalls: Don't pass struct timespec to tst_syscall()
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 13:49:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200707114952.GD3512@yuki.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200707091803.p7ptgfxa5nsleh5b@vireshk-i7>
Hi!
> > Huh, how come the syscall is called clock_getres_time64 while the rest
> > has only 64 appended such as clock_gettime64 and clock_settime64?
> >
> > That's really strange...
>
> That also made me wonder on how should I be naming routines.
> Apparently they wanted to have "time64" in the name, if the syscall
> already has "time" in it they just appended 64, else added "_time64".
If that is the case in upstream we should follow that convence for the
functions as well...
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-07 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-22 6:54 [LTP] [PATCH V2 0/6] syscalls: Remove incorrect usage of libc structures Viresh Kumar
2020-05-22 6:54 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 1/6] tst_safe_clocks: Remove safe_clock_adjtime() Viresh Kumar
2020-05-22 6:54 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 2/6] syscalls: settimeofday01: Set .restore_wallclock flag Viresh Kumar
2020-05-22 6:54 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 3/6] syscalls: settimeofday02: Remove time restoration code Viresh Kumar
2020-05-22 6:54 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 4/6] syscalls: settimeofday: Use gettimeofday() Viresh Kumar
2020-06-17 12:17 ` Cyril Hrubis
2020-05-22 6:54 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 5/6] syscalls: Don't pass struct timespec to tst_syscall() Viresh Kumar
2020-05-22 8:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-22 8:42 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-05-22 8:58 ` Cyril Hrubis
2020-06-17 12:22 ` Cyril Hrubis
2020-05-27 9:43 ` [LTP] [PATCH V3 " Viresh Kumar
2020-05-27 9:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-17 12:30 ` Cyril Hrubis
2020-06-18 5:25 ` [LTP] [PATCH V4 " Viresh Kumar
2020-06-18 11:06 ` Cyril Hrubis
2020-07-03 9:55 ` Li Wang
2020-07-03 12:26 ` Harish
2020-07-03 12:59 ` Cyril Hrubis
2020-07-04 7:14 ` Li Wang
2020-07-06 8:44 ` Harish
2020-07-06 8:57 ` Li Wang
2020-07-06 9:21 ` Harish
2020-07-07 9:03 ` Cyril Hrubis
2020-07-07 9:18 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-07 11:49 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2020-07-08 2:34 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-06 2:21 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-05-22 6:54 ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 6/6] syscalls: Don't pass struct timeval " Viresh Kumar
2020-06-17 14:08 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200707114952.GD3512@yuki.lan \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox