[LTP] [PATCH v3 0/4] TPM 2.0 fixes in IMA tests

[LTP] [PATCH v3 0/4] TPM 2.0 fixes in IMA tests

[Petr Vorel]

Hi,

few more fixes, mostly touching older kernels or evmctl versions.
Changes in 3rd and 4th commit.

Kind regards,
Petr

Petr Vorel (4):
  IMA: Move get_algorithm_digest(), set_digest_index() to ima_setup.sh
  IMA: Rewrite ima_boot_aggregate.c to new API
  ima_tpm.sh: Fix calculating boot aggregate
  ima_tpm.sh: Fix calculating PCR aggregate

 .../integrity/ima/src/ima_boot_aggregate.c    | 113 ++++----
 .../integrity/ima/tests/ima_measurements.sh   |  62 +---
 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh |  70 +++++
 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh   | 265 ++++++++++++++----
 4 files changed, 341 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-)

-- 
2.28.0

[LTP] [PATCH v3 1/4] IMA: Move get_algorithm_digest(), set_digest_index() to ima_setup.sh

[Petr Vorel]

To be reusable by more tests (preparation for next commit).

Call set_digest_index() inside get_algorithm_digest() if needed
instead of expecting get_algorithm_digest() caller to call
set_digest_index() before.

Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
---
Changes v2->v3:
none

 .../integrity/ima/tests/ima_measurements.sh   | 62 ++--------------
 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh | 70 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_measurements.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_measurements.sh
index 9a7500c76..1927e937c 100755
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_measurements.sh
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_measurements.sh
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 #
 # Verify that measurements are added to the measurement list based on policy.
 
-TST_NEEDS_CMDS="awk cut"
+TST_NEEDS_CMDS="awk cut sed"
 TST_SETUP="setup"
 TST_CNT=3
 TST_NEEDS_DEVICE=1
@@ -20,72 +20,22 @@ setup()
 	TEST_FILE="$PWD/test.txt"
 	POLICY="$IMA_DIR/policy"
 	[ -f "$POLICY" ] || tst_res TINFO "not using default policy"
-	DIGEST_INDEX=
-
-	local template="$(tail -1 $ASCII_MEASUREMENTS | cut -d' ' -f 3)"
-	local i
-
-	# parse digest index
-	# https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/security/IMA-templates.html#use
-	case "$template" in
-	ima|ima-ng|ima-sig|ima-buf) DIGEST_INDEX=4 ;;
-	*)
-		# using ima_template_fmt kernel parameter
-		local IFS="|"
-		i=4
-		for word in $template; do
-			if [ "$word" = 'd' -o "$word" = 'd-ng' ]; then
-				DIGEST_INDEX=$i
-				break
-			fi
-			i=$((i+1))
-		done
-	esac
-
-	[ -z "$DIGEST_INDEX" ] && tst_brk TCONF \
-		"Cannot find digest index (template: '$template')"
 }
 
 ima_check()
 {
-	local delimiter=':'
-	local algorithm digest expected_digest line
+	local algorithm digest expected_digest line tmp
 
 	# need to read file to get updated $ASCII_MEASUREMENTS
 	cat $TEST_FILE > /dev/null
 
 	line="$(grep $TEST_FILE $ASCII_MEASUREMENTS | tail -1)"
-	if [ -z "$line" ]; then
-		tst_res TFAIL "cannot find measurement record for '$TEST_FILE'"
-		return
-	fi
-	tst_res TINFO "measurement record: '$line'"
 
-	digest=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f $DIGEST_INDEX)
-	if [ -z "$digest" ]; then
-		tst_res TFAIL "cannot find digest (index: $DIGEST_INDEX)"
-		return
-	fi
-
-	if [ "${digest#*$delimiter}" != "$digest" ]; then
-		algorithm=$(echo "$digest" | cut -d $delimiter -f 1)
-		digest=$(echo "$digest" | cut -d $delimiter -f 2)
+	if tmp=$(get_algorithm_digest "$line"); then
+		algorithm=$(echo "$tmp" | cut -d'|' -f1)
+		digest=$(echo "$tmp" | cut -d'|' -f2)
 	else
-		case "${#digest}" in
-		32) algorithm="md5" ;;
-		40) algorithm="sha1" ;;
-		*)
-			tst_res TFAIL "algorithm must be either md5 or sha1 (digest: '$digest')"
-			return ;;
-		esac
-	fi
-	if [ -z "$algorithm" ]; then
-		tst_res TFAIL "cannot find algorithm"
-		return
-	fi
-	if [ -z "$digest" ]; then
-		tst_res TFAIL "cannot find digest"
-		return
+		tst_res TBROK "failed to get algorithm/digest for '$TEST_FILE': $tmp"
 	fi
 
 	tst_res TINFO "computing digest for $algorithm algorithm"
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
index 1f17aa707..83ea62d4f 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
@@ -191,6 +191,76 @@ ima_cleanup()
 	fi
 }
 
+set_digest_index()
+{
+	DIGEST_INDEX=
+
+	local template="$(tail -1 $ASCII_MEASUREMENTS | cut -d' ' -f 3)"
+	local i word
+
+	# parse digest index
+	# https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/security/IMA-templates.html#use
+	case "$template" in
+	ima|ima-ng|ima-sig) DIGEST_INDEX=4 ;;
+	*)
+		# using ima_template_fmt kernel parameter
+		local IFS="|"
+		i=4
+		for word in $template; do
+			if [ "$word" = 'd' -o "$word" = 'd-ng' ]; then
+				DIGEST_INDEX=$i
+				break
+			fi
+			i=$((i+1))
+		done
+	esac
+
+	[ -z "$DIGEST_INDEX" ] && tst_brk TCONF \
+		"Cannot find digest index (template: '$template')"
+}
+
+get_algorithm_digest()
+{
+	local line="$1"
+	local delimiter=':'
+	local algorithm digest
+
+	if [ -z "$line" ]; then
+		echo "measurement record not found"
+		return 1
+	fi
+
+	[ -z "$DIGEST_INDEX" ] && set_digest_index
+	digest=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f $DIGEST_INDEX)
+	if [ -z "$digest" ]; then
+		echo "digest not found (index: $DIGEST_INDEX, line: '$line')"
+		return 1
+	fi
+
+	if [ "${digest#*$delimiter}" != "$digest" ]; then
+		algorithm=$(echo "$digest" | cut -d $delimiter -f 1)
+		digest=$(echo "$digest" | cut -d $delimiter -f 2)
+	else
+		case "${#digest}" in
+		32) algorithm="md5" ;;
+		40) algorithm="sha1" ;;
+		*)
+			echo "algorithm must be either md5 or sha1 (digest: '$digest')"
+			return 1 ;;
+		esac
+	fi
+	if [ -z "$algorithm" ]; then
+		echo "algorithm not found"
+		return 1
+	fi
+	if [ -z "$digest" ]; then
+		echo "digest not found"
+		return 1
+	fi
+
+	echo "$algorithm|$digest"
+}
+
 # loop device is needed to use only for tmpfs
 TMPDIR="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}"
 if [ "$(df -T $TMPDIR | tail -1 | awk '{print $2}')" != "tmpfs" -a -n "$TST_NEEDS_DEVICE" ]; then
-- 
2.28.0

[LTP] [PATCH v3 2/4] IMA: Rewrite ima_boot_aggregate.c to new API

[Petr Vorel]

The main reason was to see TCONF messages, which are printed into stderr
in new API (but to stdout in legacy API) and thus visible as the output
is redirected into the variable.

Changing boot_aggregate: to sha1: to be compatible with evmctl
ima_boot_aggregate.

Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
---
Changes v2->v3:
none

 .../integrity/ima/src/ima_boot_aggregate.c    | 113 +++++++++---------
 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh   |   2 +-
 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/src/ima_boot_aggregate.c b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/src/ima_boot_aggregate.c
index 98893b99a..67f97ea04 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/src/ima_boot_aggregate.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/src/ima_boot_aggregate.c
@@ -1,19 +1,15 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
 /*
-* Copyright (c) International Business Machines  Corp., 2009
-*
-* Authors:
-* Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>
-*
-* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
-* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
-* published by the Free Software Foundation, version 2 of the
-* License.
-*
-* File: ima_boot_aggregate.c
-*
-* Calculate a SHA1 boot aggregate value based on the TPM
-* binary_bios_measurements.
-*/
+ * Copyright (c) International Business Machines  Corp., 2009
+ * Copyright (c) 2016-2019 Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
+ *
+ * Authors: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>
+ *
+ * Calculate a SHA1 boot aggregate value based on the TPM 1.2
+ * binary_bios_measurements.
+ */
+
+#include "config.h"
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <sys/types.h>
@@ -23,10 +19,8 @@
 #include <unistd.h>
 #include <limits.h>
 
-#include "config.h"
-#include "test.h"
-
-char *TCID = "ima_boot_aggregate";
+#include "tst_test.h"
+#include "tst_safe_stdio.h"
 
 #if HAVE_LIBCRYPTO
 #include <openssl/sha.h>
@@ -36,7 +30,24 @@ char *TCID = "ima_boot_aggregate";
 #define MAX_EVENT_DATA_SIZE (MAX_EVENT_SIZE - EVENT_HEADER_SIZE)
 #define NUM_PCRS 8		/*  PCR registers 0-7 in boot aggregate */
 
-int TST_TOTAL = 1;
+static char *debug;
+static char *file;
+
+static unsigned char boot_aggregate[SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH];
+
+static struct {
+	struct {
+		u_int32_t pcr;
+		u_int32_t type;
+		u_int8_t digest[SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH];
+		u_int32_t len;
+	} header __attribute__ ((packed));
+	char *data;
+} event;
+
+static struct {
+	unsigned char digest[SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH];
+} pcr[NUM_PCRS];
 
 static void display_sha1_digest(unsigned char *pcr)
 {
@@ -47,45 +58,24 @@ static void display_sha1_digest(unsigned char *pcr)
 	printf("\n");
 }
 
-int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+static void do_test(void)
 {
-	unsigned char boot_aggregate[SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH];
-	struct {
-		struct {
-			u_int32_t pcr;
-			u_int32_t type;
-			u_int8_t digest[SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH];
-			u_int32_t len;
-		} header __attribute__ ((packed));
-		char *data;
-	} event;
-	struct {
-		unsigned char digest[SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH];
-	} pcr[NUM_PCRS];
 	FILE *fp;
-	int i;
-	int debug = 0;
 	SHA_CTX c;
+	int i;
 
-	if (argc != 2) {
-		printf("format: %s binary_bios_measurement file\n", argv[0]);
-		return 1;
-	}
-	fp = fopen(argv[1], "r");
-	if (!fp) {
-		perror("unable to open pcr file\n");
-		return 1;
-	}
+	if (!file)
+		tst_brk(TBROK, "missing binary_bios_measurement file, specify with -f");
+
+	fp = SAFE_FOPEN(file, "r");
 
 	/* Initialize psuedo PCR registers 0 - 7 */
 	for (i = 0; i < NUM_PCRS; i++)
 		memset(&pcr[i].digest, 0, SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH);
 
 	event.data = malloc(MAX_EVENT_DATA_SIZE);
-	if (!event.data) {
-		printf("Cannot allocate memory\n");
-		return 1;
-	}
+	if (!event.data)
+		tst_brk(TBROK, "cannot allocate memory");
 
 	/* Extend the pseudo PCRs with the event digest */
 	while (fread(&event, sizeof(event.header), 1, fp)) {
@@ -105,13 +95,14 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 
 #if MAX_EVENT_DATA_SIZE < USHRT_MAX
 		if (event.header.len > MAX_EVENT_DATA_SIZE) {
-			printf("Error event too long\n");
+			tst_res(TWARN, "error event too long");
 			break;
 		}
 #endif
 		fread(event.data, event.header.len, 1, fp);
 	}
-	fclose(fp);
+
+	SAFE_FCLOSE(fp);
 	free(event.data);
 
 	/* Extend the boot aggregate with the pseudo PCR digest values */
@@ -126,14 +117,22 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	}
 	SHA1_Final(boot_aggregate, &c);
 
-	printf("boot_aggregate:");
+	printf("sha1:");
 	display_sha1_digest(boot_aggregate);
-	tst_exit();
+	tst_res(TPASS, "found sha1 hash");
 }
 
+static struct tst_option options[] = {
+	{"d", &debug, "-d       enable debug"},
+	{"f:", &file, "-f x     binary_bios_measurement file (required)\n"},
+	{NULL, NULL, NULL}
+};
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+	.test_all = do_test,
+	.options = options,
+};
+
 #else
-int main(void)
-{
-	tst_brkm(TCONF, NULL, "test requires libcrypto and openssl development packages");
-}
+TST_TEST_TCONF("libcrypto and openssl development packages required");
 #endif
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh
index c69f891f1..dc958eb5c 100755
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ test1()
 			tst_res TFAIL "bios boot aggregate is not 0"
 		fi
 	else
-		boot_aggregate=$(ima_boot_aggregate $tpm_bios | grep "boot_aggregate:" | cut -d':' -f2)
+		boot_aggregate=$(ima_boot_aggregate -f $tpm_bios | grep "sha1:" | cut -d':' -f2)
 		if [ "$boot_hash" = "$boot_aggregate" ]; then
 			tst_res TPASS "bios aggregate matches IMA boot aggregate"
 		else
-- 
2.28.0

[LTP] [PATCH v3 2/4] IMA: Rewrite ima_boot_aggregate.c to new API

[Mimi Zohar]

On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 18:50 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> The main reason was to see TCONF messages, which are printed into stderr
> in new API (but to stdout in legacy API) and thus visible as the output
> is redirected into the variable.
> 
> Changing boot_aggregate: to sha1: to be compatible with evmctl
> ima_boot_aggregate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> ---

<snip>

> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh
> index c69f891f1..dc958eb5c 100755
> --- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ test1()
>  			tst_res TFAIL "bios boot aggregate is not 0"
>  		fi
>  	else
> -		boot_aggregate=$(ima_boot_aggregate $tpm_bios | grep "boot_aggregate:" | cut -d':' -f2)
> +		boot_aggregate=$(ima_boot_aggregate -f $tpm_bios | grep "sha1:" | cut -d':' -f2)
>  		if [ "$boot_hash" = "$boot_aggregate" ]; then
>  			tst_res TPASS "bios aggregate matches IMA boot aggregate"
>  		else

The original "ima" template is just the hash digest, without the
algorithm.

Mimi

[LTP] [PATCH v3 2/4] IMA: Rewrite ima_boot_aggregate.c to new API

[Petr Vorel]

Hi Mimi,

> <snip>

> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh
> > index c69f891f1..dc958eb5c 100755
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh
> > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ test1()
> >  			tst_res TFAIL "bios boot aggregate is not 0"
> >  		fi
> >  	else
> > -		boot_aggregate=$(ima_boot_aggregate $tpm_bios | grep "boot_aggregate:" | cut -d':' -f2)
> > +		boot_aggregate=$(ima_boot_aggregate -f $tpm_bios | grep "sha1:" | cut -d':' -f2)
> >  		if [ "$boot_hash" = "$boot_aggregate" ]; then
> >  			tst_res TPASS "bios aggregate matches IMA boot aggregate"
> >  		else

> The original "ima" template is just the hash digest, without the
> algorithm.
Yes, but this code is output of ima_boot_aggregate.c. And code detecting old
format is still working (verified on ima_measurements.sh with ima_tcb kernel
parameter on 3.10).

Kind regards,
Petr

[LTP] [PATCH v3 3/4] ima_tpm.sh: Fix calculating boot aggregate

[Petr Vorel]

for TPM 2.0 or kernel >= v5.8-rc1:
6f1a1d103b48 ima: ("Switch to ima_hash_algo for boot aggregate")

Test still fails with TPM 2.0 on kernel < v5.8-rc1.

Test was failing, because it expect SHA1 hash, but for TPM 2.0 is
now used IMA default hash algorithm (by default default SHA256).
This is similar for entries in IMA measurement list so we can reuse
already existing code.

Reading other algorithms than sha1 or TPM 2.0 requires evmctl >= 1.3.
Although recent evmctl is recommended, to support older kernels when
sha1 is used, get boot aggregate with old our legacy ima_boot_aggregate.c.

Also fixed test without TPM device (when IMA TPM-bypass is tested)
as some TPM 2.0 devices does not export event log
(/sys/kernel/security/tpm0/binary_bios_measurements).
This does not require evmctl at all.

Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
---
Changes v2->v3:
* separate testing real HW and IMA TPM-bypass into it's own functions
* fixed checking in check_evmctl
* improve get_tpm_version to not depend on having dmesg on IMA TPM-bypass

Kind regards,
Petr

 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh   | 153 +++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 131 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh
index dc958eb5c..7eb3a9409 100755
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh
@@ -7,41 +7,150 @@
 # Verify the boot and PCR aggregates.
 
 TST_CNT=2
-TST_NEEDS_CMDS="awk cut ima_boot_aggregate"
+TST_NEEDS_CMDS="awk cut"
+TST_SETUP="setup"
 
 . ima_setup.sh
 
-test1()
-{
-	tst_res TINFO "verify boot aggregate"
+EVMCTL_REQUIRED='1.3'
+ERRMSG_EVMCTL="install evmctl >= $EVMCTL_REQUIRED"
 
-	local zero="0000000000000000000000000000000000000000"
-	local tpm_bios="$SECURITYFS/tpm0/binary_bios_measurements"
-	local ima_measurements="$ASCII_MEASUREMENTS"
-	local boot_aggregate boot_hash line
+setup()
+{
+	local line tmp
 
-	# IMA boot aggregate
-	read line < $ima_measurements
-	boot_hash=$(echo $line | awk '{print $(NF-1)}' | cut -d':' -f2)
+	read line < $ASCII_MEASUREMENTS
+	if tmp=$(get_algorithm_digest "$line"); then
+		ALGORITHM=$(echo "$tmp" | cut -d'|' -f1)
+		DIGEST=$(echo "$tmp" | cut -d'|' -f2)
+	else
+		tst_res TBROK "failed to get algorithm/digest: $tmp"
+	fi
+	tst_res TINFO "used algorithm: $ALGORITHM"
 
-	if [ ! -f "$tpm_bios" ]; then
-		tst_res TINFO "TPM Hardware Support not enabled in kernel or no TPM chip found"
+	TPM_VERSION="$(get_tpm_version)"
+	if [ "$TPM_VERSION" ]; then
+		tst_res TINFO "TMP major version: $TPM_VERSION"
+	fi
 
-		if [ "$boot_hash" = "$zero" ]; then
-			tst_res TPASS "bios boot aggregate is 0"
-		else
-			tst_res TFAIL "bios boot aggregate is not 0"
+	if ! check_evmctl $EVMCTL_REQUIRED; then
+		if [ "$ALGORITHM" != "sha1" ]; then
+			tst_brk TCONF "algorithm not sha1 ($ALGORITHM), $ERRMSG_EVMCTL"
 		fi
+		MISSING_EVMCTL=1
+	fi
+}
+
+# check_evmctl REQUIRED_TPM_VERSION
+# return: 0: evmctl is new enough, 1: too old version (or version > v0.9)
+check_evmctl()
+{
+	local required="$1"
+
+	local r1="$(echo $required | cut -d. -f1)"
+	local r2="$(echo $required | cut -d. -f2)"
+	local r3="$(echo $required | cut -d. -f3)"
+	[ -z "$r3" ] && r3=0
+
+	tst_is_int "$r1" || tst_brk TBROK "required major version not int ($v1)"
+	tst_is_int "$r2" || tst_brk TBROK "required minor version not int ($v2)"
+	tst_is_int "$r3" || tst_brk TBROK "required patch version not int ($v3)"
+
+	tst_check_cmds evmctl || return 1
+
+	local v="$(evmctl --version | cut -d' ' -f2)"
+	[ -z "$v" ] && return 1
+	tst_res TINFO "evmctl version: $v"
+
+	local v1="$(echo $v | cut -d. -f1)"
+	local v2="$(echo $v | cut -d. -f2)"
+	local v3="$(echo $v | cut -d. -f3)"
+	[ -z "$v3" ] && v3=0
+
+	if [ $v1 -lt $r1 ] || [ $v1 -eq $r1 -a $v2 -lt $r2 ] || \
+		[ $v1 -eq $r1 -a $v2 -eq $r2 -a $v3 -lt $r3 ]; then
+		return 1
+	fi
+	return 0
+}
+
+# prints major version 1: TPM 1.2, 2: TPM 2.0
+# or nothing when version not detected (no TPM device)
+get_tpm_version()
+{
+	if [ -f /sys/class/tpm/tpm0/tpm_version_major ]; then
+		cat /sys/class/tpm/tpm0/tpm_version_major
+		return
+	fi
+
+	if [ -f /sys/class/tpm/tpm0/device/caps -o \
+		-f /sys/class/misc/tpm0/device/caps ]; then
+		echo 1
+		return
+	fi
+
+	if [ ! -d /sys/class/tpm/tpm0/ -a ! -d /sys/class/misc/tpm0/ ]; then
+		return
+	fi
+
+	tst_check_cmds dmesg || return
+	if dmesg | grep -q '1\.2 TPM (device-id'; then
+		echo 1
+	elif dmesg | grep -q '2\.0 TPM (device-id'; then
+		echo 2
+	fi
+}
+
+test1_virtual_tpm()
+{
+	local zero=$(echo $DIGEST | awk '{gsub(/./, "0")}; {print}')
+
+	tst_res TINFO "TPM hardware support not enabled in kernel or no TPM chip found, testing TPM-bypass"
+
+	if [ "$DIGEST" = "$zero" ]; then
+		tst_res TPASS "bios boot aggregate is $zero"
 	else
-		boot_aggregate=$(ima_boot_aggregate -f $tpm_bios | grep "sha1:" | cut -d':' -f2)
-		if [ "$boot_hash" = "$boot_aggregate" ]; then
-			tst_res TPASS "bios aggregate matches IMA boot aggregate"
-		else
-			tst_res TFAIL "bios aggregate does not match IMA boot aggregate"
+		tst_res TFAIL "bios boot aggregate is not $zero ($DIGEST)"
+	fi
+}
+
+test1_hw_tpm()
+{
+	local tpm_bios="$SECURITYFS/tpm0/binary_bios_measurements"
+	local cmd="evmctl ima_boot_aggregate"
+	local boot_aggregate
+
+	if [ "$MISSING_EVMCTL" = 1 ]; then
+		if [ ! -f "$tpm_bios" ]; then
+			tst_res TCONF "missing $tpm_bios, $ERRMSG_EVMCTL"
+			return
 		fi
+		tst_check_cmds ima_boot_aggregate || return
+		cmd="ima_boot_aggregate -f $tpm_bios"
+	fi
+	tst_res TINFO "using command: $cmd"
+
+	boot_aggregate=$($cmd | grep "$ALGORITHM:" | cut -d':' -f2)
+	if [ -z "$boot_aggregate" ]; then
+		tst_res TBROK "failed to get boot aggregate"
+		return
+	fi
+	tst_res TINFO "IMA boot aggregate: '$boot_aggregate'"
+
+	if [ "$DIGEST" = "$boot_aggregate" ]; then
+		tst_res TPASS "bios boot aggregate matches IMA boot aggregate"
+	else
+		tst_res TFAIL "bios boot aggregate does not match IMA boot aggregate ($DIGEST)"
 	fi
 }
 
+test1()
+{
+	tst_res TINFO "verify boot aggregate"
+
+	[ -z "$TPM_VERSION" ] && test1_virtual_tpm || test1_hw_tpm
+}
+
 # Probably cleaner to programmatically read the PCR values directly
 # from the TPM, but that would require a TPM library. For now, use
 # the PCR values from /sys/devices.
-- 
2.28.0

[LTP] [PATCH v3 3/4] ima_tpm.sh: Fix calculating boot aggregate

[Mimi Zohar]

On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 18:50 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> for TPM 2.0 or kernel >= v5.8-rc1:
> 6f1a1d103b48 ima: ("Switch to ima_hash_algo for boot aggregate")
> 
> Test still fails with TPM 2.0 on kernel < v5.8-rc1.
> 
> Test was failing, because it expect SHA1 hash, but for TPM 2.0 is
> now used IMA default hash algorithm (by default default SHA256).

TPM 1.2 only supported MD5 and SHA1, at least the IMA measurement list
did.  (This is probably the reason it searched for "boot_aggregate" and
not "sha1".)  Nobody should be using MD5, so the boot_aggregate for TPM
1.2 should always be SHA1.

For TPM 2.0, which supports multiple algorithms, it's a bit more
complicated.  The hash algorithm used for calculating the
"boot_aggregate" is dependent on which TPM bank is enabled.  For
example, even if the default IMA measurement hash is defined as SHA256,
but the TPM 2.0 SHA256 bank isn't enabled, it will fall back to
calculating a SHA1 "boot_aggregate".

For backwards compatibility, the SHA1 boot_aggregate is based on PCRs 0
-7, while all others include PCRs 0 - 9.

> This is similar for entries in IMA measurement list so we can reuse
> already existing code.
> 
> Reading other algorithms than sha1 or TPM 2.0 requires evmctl >= 1.3.
> Although recent evmctl is recommended, to support older kernels when
> sha1 is used, get boot aggregate with old our legacy ima_boot_aggregate.c.

For example, some PTT firmware (TPM 2.0) only supports SHA1.  (I've
seen some TPM 2.0's using the TPM 1.2 event log format.)   Instead of
saying, "to support older kernels when sha1 is used, get boot_aggregate
...", it should say "to support older TPMs, calculate the
"boot_aggregate" with ...cat

One of the major differences is that the original TPM 1.2 support
walked the TPM event log, extending the PCRs.  Only after re-
calculating the PCRs, would it calculate the "boot_aggregate".  The TPM
2.0 support assumes that some other mechanism exists for verifying the
PCRs against the TPM event log* and just calculates the
"boot_aggregate" based on the existing TPM PCR values.

* tsseventextend -sim -if
/sys/kernel/security/tpm0/binary_bios_measurements  -v -ns

Mimi

> 
> Also fixed test without TPM device (when IMA TPM-bypass is tested)
> as some TPM 2.0 devices does not export event log
> (/sys/kernel/security/tpm0/binary_bios_measurements).
> This does not require evmctl at all.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> ---
> Changes v2->v3:
> * separate testing real HW and IMA TPM-bypass into it's own functions
> * fixed checking in check_evmctl
> * improve get_tpm_version to not depend on having dmesg on IMA TPM-bypass
> 
> Kind regards,
> Petr

[LTP] [PATCH v3 4/4] ima_tpm.sh: Fix calculating PCR aggregate

[Petr Vorel]

for TPM 2.0 and never or very old evmctl versions.

Because exporting PCR registers for TPM 2.0 has not been upstreamed [1],
we use user space code, which requires evmctl >= 1.3 and tsspcrread.
Using evmctl allows to test for TPM devices which does not export event
log (/sys/kernel/security/tpm0/binary_bios_measurements).

For TPM 1.2 read tpm0 device pcrs file from kernel. (tss1pcrread could
be also used, but it's not yet packaged by distros.)

For old kernels which use sha1, any evmctl version is required (evmctl
ima_measurement was introduced in very old v0.7, but newer sysctl path
/sys/class/tpm/tpm0/device/pcrs requires evmctl 1.1)

We now support output format of ima_measurement command for various
evmctl versions:
* 1.3: "sha256: TPM PCR-10:" (or other algorithm, e.g. "sha1")
* 1.1-1.2.1: "HW PCR-10:" (the only previously supported format)
* 0.7-1.0: "PCR-10:"
NOTE: we ignore evmctl failure, because evmctl < 1.1 fails with
"PCRAgg does not match PCR-10".

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11759729/

Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
---
Changes v2->v3:
* grep for PCRAgg (compatible with older versions)
* do not check evmctl ima_measurement failure due "PCRAgg does not match
  PCR-10" on evmctl < 1.1
* require evmctl 1.1 for new /sys/class/tpm/tpm0/device/pcrs

Kind regards,
Petr

 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh   | 128 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh
index 7eb3a9409..b878467ed 100755
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ TST_SETUP="setup"
 
 EVMCTL_REQUIRED='1.3'
 ERRMSG_EVMCTL="install evmctl >= $EVMCTL_REQUIRED"
+ERRMSG_TPM="TPM hardware support not enabled in kernel or no TPM chip found"
 
 setup()
 {
@@ -101,11 +102,72 @@ get_tpm_version()
 	fi
 }
 
+read_pcr_tpm1()
+{
+	local pcr_path="/sys/class/tpm/tpm0/device/pcrs"
+	local evmctl_required="1.1"
+	local pcr hash
+
+	if [ ! -f "$pcrs_path" ]; then
+		pcrs_path="/sys/class/misc/tpm0/device/pcrs"
+	else
+		check_evmctl $evmctl_required || \
+			tst_brk TCONF "evmctl >= $evmctl_required required"
+	fi
+
+	if [ ! -f "$pcr_path" ]; then
+		tst_brk TCONF "missing PCR file $pcrs_path ($ERRMSG_TPM)"
+	fi
+
+	while read line; do
+		pcr="$(echo $line | cut -d':' -f1)"
+		hash="$(echo $line | cut -d':' -f2 | awk '{ gsub (" ", "", $0); print tolower($0) }')"
+		echo "$pcr: $hash"
+	done < $pcr_path
+}
+
+# NOTE: TPM 1.2 would require to use tss1pcrread which is not fully adopted
+# by distros yet.
+read_pcr_tpm2()
+{
+	local pcrmax=23
+	local pcrread="tsspcrread -halg $ALGORITHM"
+	local i pcr
+
+	tst_check_cmds tsspcrread || return 1
+
+	for i in $(seq 0 $pcrmax); do
+		pcr=$($pcrread -ha "$i" -ns)
+		if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
+			tst_brk TBROK "tsspcrread failed: $pcr"
+		fi
+		printf "PCR-%02d: %s\n" $i "$pcr"
+	done
+}
+
+get_pcr10_aggregate()
+{
+	local pcr
+
+	evmctl -v ima_measurement $BINARY_MEASUREMENTS > hash.txt 2>&1
+
+	pcr=$(grep -E "^($ALGORITHM: )*PCRAgg.*:" hash.txt \
+		| awk '{print $NF}')
+
+	if [ -z "$pcr" ]; then
+		tst_res TFAIL "evmctl failed to get aggregate PCR-10"
+		cat hash.txt >&2
+		return
+	fi
+
+	echo "$pcr"
+}
+
 test1_virtual_tpm()
 {
 	local zero=$(echo $DIGEST | awk '{gsub(/./, "0")}; {print}')
 
-	tst_res TINFO "TPM hardware support not enabled in kernel or no TPM chip found, testing TPM-bypass"
+	tst_res TINFO "$ERRMSG_TPM, testing TPM-bypass"
 
 	if [ "$DIGEST" = "$zero" ]; then
 		tst_res TPASS "bios boot aggregate is $zero"
@@ -151,57 +213,39 @@ test1()
 	[ -z "$TPM_VERSION" ] && test1_virtual_tpm || test1_hw_tpm
 }
 
-# Probably cleaner to programmatically read the PCR values directly
-# from the TPM, but that would require a TPM library. For now, use
-# the PCR values from /sys/devices.
-validate_pcr()
+test2()
 {
-	tst_res TINFO "verify PCR (Process Control Register)"
+	local hash pcr_aggregate
 
-	local dev_pcrs="$1"
-	local pcr hash aggregate_pcr
+	tst_res TINFO "verify PCR values"
 
-	aggregate_pcr="$(evmctl -v ima_measurement $BINARY_MEASUREMENTS 2>&1 | \
-		grep 'HW PCR-10:' | awk '{print $3}')"
-	if [ -z "$aggregate_pcr" ]; then
-		tst_res TFAIL "failed to get PCR-10"
-		return 1
+	if [ -z "$TPM_VERSION" ]; then
+		tst_brk TCONF "TMP version not detected ($ERRMSG_TPM)"
 	fi
 
-	while read line; do
-		pcr="$(echo $line | cut -d':' -f1)"
-		if [ "$pcr" = "PCR-10" ]; then
-			hash="$(echo $line | cut -d':' -f2 | awk '{ gsub (" ", "", $0); print tolower($0) }')"
-			[ "$hash" = "$aggregate_pcr" ]
-			return $?
-		fi
-	done < $dev_pcrs
-	return 1
-}
-
-test2()
-{
-	tst_res TINFO "verify PCR values"
-	tst_check_cmds evmctl || return
+	if [ "$ALGORITHM" = "sha1" ]; then
+		tst_check_cmds evmctl || return 1
+	fi
 
-	tst_res TINFO "evmctl version: $(evmctl --version)"
+	read_pcr_tpm$TPM_VERSION > pcr.txt
+	hash=$(grep "^PCR-10" pcr.txt | cut -d' ' -f2)
+	if [ -z "$hash" ]; then
+		tst_res TBROK "PCR-10 hash not found"
+		cat pcr.txt
+		return 1
+	fi
+	tst_res TINFO "real PCR-10: '$hash'"
 
-	local pcrs_path="/sys/class/tpm/tpm0/device/pcrs"
-	if [ -f "$pcrs_path" ]; then
-		tst_res TINFO "new PCRS path, evmctl >= 1.1 required"
-	else
-		pcrs_path="/sys/class/misc/tpm0/device/pcrs"
+	pcr_aggregate="$(get_pcr10_aggregate)"
+	if [ -z "$pcr_aggregate" ]; then
+		return
 	fi
+	tst_res TINFO "aggregate PCR-10: '$hash'"
 
-	if [ -f "$pcrs_path" ]; then
-		validate_pcr $pcrs_path
-		if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
-			tst_res TPASS "aggregate PCR value matches real PCR value"
-		else
-			tst_res TFAIL "aggregate PCR value does not match real PCR value"
-		fi
+	if [ "$hash" = "$pcr_aggregate" ]; then
+		tst_res TPASS "aggregate PCR value matches real PCR value"
 	else
-		tst_res TCONF "TPM Hardware Support not enabled in kernel or no TPM chip found"
+		tst_res TFAIL "aggregate PCR value does not match real PCR value"
 	fi
 }
 
-- 
2.28.0

[LTP] [PATCH v3 4/4] ima_tpm.sh: Fix calculating PCR aggregate

[Mimi Zohar]

Hi Petr,

On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 18:50 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> +get_pcr10_aggregate()
> +{
> +       local pcr
> +
> +       evmctl -v ima_measurement $BINARY_MEASUREMENTS > hash.txt 2>&1
> +
> +       pcr=$(grep -E "^($ALGORITHM: )*PCRAgg.*:" hash.txt \
> +               | awk '{print $NF}')
> +
> +       if [ -z "$pcr" ]; then
> +               tst_res TFAIL "evmctl failed to get aggregate PCR-10"
> +               cat hash.txt >&2
> +               return
> +       fi
> +
> +       echo "$pcr"
> +}
> +

I'm seeing the following output:

10 a528ab7a7096e0187aa5c154502f467a0f931873 ima-ng
sha1:75bf81bc120313f6aa61430fad4a47afceea3e7c
/usr/local/lib/libimaevm.so.2.0.0
Failed to match per TPM bank or SHA1 padded TPM digest(s).
errno: No such file or directory (2)
ima_tpm 2 TBROK: Test didn't report any results
ima_tpm 2 TINFO: SELinux enabled in enforcing mode, this may affect
test results
ima_tpm 2 TINFO: it can be disabled with TST_DISABLE_SELINUX=1
(requires super/root)
ima_tpm 2 TINFO: install seinfo to find used SELinux profiles
ima_tpm 2 TINFO: loaded SELinux profiles: none

SELinux is blamed enough for different things.  Let's not add verifying
the IMA measurement list.  A more likely reason for failing to validate
the measurement list is that it contains violations.  Normally this is
because the builtin "ima_policy=tcb" policy has not been replaced with
a custom policy, based on LSM labels.

Test2 should fail when the measurement list contains violations, but it
should retry validating the measurement list with the "--ignore-
violations" option to provide additional context.

thanks,

Mimi

[LTP] [PATCH v3 0/4] TPM 2.0 fixes in IMA tests

[Petr Vorel]

Hi Mimi, Lakshmi,

sorry for late version. FYI Cyril is planning to release LTP tomorrow evening,
thus To get it into this release require review and testing till tomorrow lunch
or something.
Thus understand if you don't have time for it.

NOTE: crazy support for old versions was important to get support for older SLES
versions.

Kind regards,
Petr

> Hi,

> few more fixes, mostly touching older kernels or evmctl versions.
> Changes in 3rd and 4th commit.

> Kind regards,
> Petr

> Petr Vorel (4):
>   IMA: Move get_algorithm_digest(), set_digest_index() to ima_setup.sh
>   IMA: Rewrite ima_boot_aggregate.c to new API
>   ima_tpm.sh: Fix calculating boot aggregate
>   ima_tpm.sh: Fix calculating PCR aggregate

>  .../integrity/ima/src/ima_boot_aggregate.c    | 113 ++++----
>  .../integrity/ima/tests/ima_measurements.sh   |  62 +---
>  .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh |  70 +++++
>  .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh   | 265 ++++++++++++++----
>  4 files changed, 341 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-)

[LTP] [PATCH v3 0/4] TPM 2.0 fixes in IMA tests

[Mimi Zohar]

Hi Petr,

On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 18:53 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi Mimi, Lakshmi,
> 
> sorry for late version. FYI Cyril is planning to release LTP tomorrow evening,
> thus To get it into this release require review and testing till tomorrow lunch
> or something.
> Thus understand if you don't have time for it.
> 
> NOTE: crazy support for old versions was important to get support for older SLES
> versions.

Thank you so much for updating the ima_tpm.sh test.  Of all the
comments, it would be nice to re-verify the measurement list with "
--ignore-violations" to provide more context.  Anyone running with just
the ima_policy=tcb, would have violations.  You should be able to test
that yourself with the logs, PCRs, and directions,  I sent you.

In terms of supporting the "ima" template, I think it would only be for
old, existing systems, but then I doubt they would be running ltp.  
The "boot_aggregate" to "sha1" change works on a system with TPM 1.2.

Mimi

[LTP] [PATCH v3 0/4] TPM 2.0 fixes in IMA tests

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 06:50:17PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> few more fixes, mostly touching older kernels or evmctl versions.
> Changes in 3rd and 4th commit.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Petr
> 
> Petr Vorel (4):
>   IMA: Move get_algorithm_digest(), set_digest_index() to ima_setup.sh
>   IMA: Rewrite ima_boot_aggregate.c to new API
>   ima_tpm.sh: Fix calculating boot aggregate
>   ima_tpm.sh: Fix calculating PCR aggregate
> 
>  .../integrity/ima/src/ima_boot_aggregate.c    | 113 ++++----
>  .../integrity/ima/tests/ima_measurements.sh   |  62 +---
>  .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh |  70 +++++
>  .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh   | 265 ++++++++++++++----
>  4 files changed, 341 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.28.0
> 

Hi, is there something specific I should look at in this patch set?

/Jarkko

[LTP] [PATCH v3 0/4] TPM 2.0 fixes in IMA tests

[Petr Vorel]

Hi Jarkko,

> Hi, is there something specific I should look at in this patch set?

I'm sorry to bother you with LTP specific code. Can you have a quick look if I
didn't overlook anything obvious in reading PCR files (read_pcr_tpm*())?

I'm surprised that it's working on my TPM 2.0 which does not export
/sys/kernel/security/tpm0/binary_bios_measurements (using evmctl).

> /Jarkko

Kind regards,
Petr

[LTP] [PATCH v3 0/4] TPM 2.0 fixes in IMA tests

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 07:53:14AM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi Jarkko,
> 
> > Hi, is there something specific I should look at in this patch set?
> 
> I'm sorry to bother you with LTP specific code. Can you have a quick look if I
> didn't overlook anything obvious in reading PCR files (read_pcr_tpm*())?
> 
> I'm surprised that it's working on my TPM 2.0 which does not export
> /sys/kernel/security/tpm0/binary_bios_measurements (using evmctl).

Thank you, this was actually really important remark and reminder.

OK so I think James' patch is stuck because of me, i.e.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20200911114820.GB6877@linux.intel.com/

I'm sorry about this. The final final conclusion is that the way it
exports PCRs is just fine.

Can you test this version?

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11759729/

I can then add reviewd-by and apply it and you don't have to do any sort
of stupid hacks.

/Jarkkko

[LTP] [PATCH v3 0/4] TPM 2.0 fixes in IMA tests

[Petr Vorel]

Hi Jarkko,

> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 07:53:14AM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > Hi Jarkko,

> > > Hi, is there something specific I should look at in this patch set?

> > I'm sorry to bother you with LTP specific code. Can you have a quick look if I
> > didn't overlook anything obvious in reading PCR files (read_pcr_tpm*())?

> > I'm surprised that it's working on my TPM 2.0 which does not export
> > /sys/kernel/security/tpm0/binary_bios_measurements (using evmctl).

> Thank you, this was actually really important remark and reminder.

> OK so I think James' patch is stuck because of me, i.e.

> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20200911114820.GB6877@linux.intel.com/

> I'm sorry about this. The final final conclusion is that the way it
> exports PCRs is just fine.
That's a great, thank you for going to upstream James' patch.
James, thanks for implementing it!

> Can you test this version?
Sure, I'll test it next week.

> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11759729/


> I can then add reviewd-by and apply it and you don't have to do any sort
> of stupid hacks.
I'll need to keep these hacks for older kernels, but it's great that there is a
better solution.

Other thing: do you know anybody practically uses more TPM devices in single
machine? I'm asking that I work with tpm0 in ima_tpm.sh, but maybe I should
allow user to redefine it to choose different device (or even run tests for all
available devices).

Kind regards,
Petr

> /Jarkkko

[LTP] [PATCH v3 0/4] TPM 2.0 fixes in IMA tests

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 02:01:25PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> I'll need to keep these hacks for older kernels, but it's great that there is a
> better solution.
> 
> Other thing: do you know anybody practically uses more TPM devices in single
> machine? I'm asking that I work with tpm0 in ima_tpm.sh, but maybe I should
> allow user to redefine it to choose different device (or even run tests for all
> available devices).

You can create a proxy TPM device for a TPM emulator or a software TPM
(e.g. could be an SGX enclave) by using ioctl interface /dev/vtpmx,
provided by tpm_vtpm_proxy driver. QEMU provides a passthrough interface
from TPM devices to the VM, which can be utilized for this.

This one I know at least.

> Kind regards,
> Petr

/Jarkko