From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Vorel Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:53:48 +0200 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v3 2/4] IMA: Rewrite ima_boot_aggregate.c to new API In-Reply-To: <4c0ec7617f2686ffdd4565a05beddd34ebf0b6aa.camel@linux.ibm.com> References: <20200929165021.11731-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20200929165021.11731-3-pvorel@suse.cz> <4c0ec7617f2686ffdd4565a05beddd34ebf0b6aa.camel@linux.ibm.com> Message-ID: <20200930065348.GB21664@dell5510> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi Mimi, > > > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh > > index c69f891f1..dc958eb5c 100755 > > --- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh > > +++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_tpm.sh > > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ test1() > > tst_res TFAIL "bios boot aggregate is not 0" > > fi > > else > > - boot_aggregate=$(ima_boot_aggregate $tpm_bios | grep "boot_aggregate:" | cut -d':' -f2) > > + boot_aggregate=$(ima_boot_aggregate -f $tpm_bios | grep "sha1:" | cut -d':' -f2) > > if [ "$boot_hash" = "$boot_aggregate" ]; then > > tst_res TPASS "bios aggregate matches IMA boot aggregate" > > else > The original "ima" template is just the hash digest, without the > algorithm. Yes, but this code is output of ima_boot_aggregate.c. And code detecting old format is still working (verified on ima_measurements.sh with ima_tcb kernel parameter on 3.10). Kind regards, Petr