From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Hrubis Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 15:49:36 +0200 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] fanotify: Test with tst_variant both raw syscall and libc In-Reply-To: <20200428113501.24711-2-pvorel@suse.cz> References: <20200428113501.24711-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20200428113501.24711-2-pvorel@suse.cz> Message-ID: <20201014134936.GB13224@yuki.lan> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi! > libc wrappers for fanotify_init() and fanotify_mark() are trivial, so it > might not make sense to test both variants. WDYT? Hmm, I guess that fanotify_init() and fanotify_mark() are included in libc for quite some time, so it does not make much sense to go for the raw syscall here. But I do not have a strong opinion here, if anyone thinks that this would be useful, we can as well go for it. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz