From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2 3/4] tst_atomic: add atomic_add_return for x86/64, ppc/64 and s390/x
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 08:08:44 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2021746918.1819347.1460722124804.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160414143622.GC22998@rei.suse.cz>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cyril Hrubis" <chrubis@suse.cz>
> To: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>
> Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
> Sent: Thursday, 14 April, 2016 4:36:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 3/4] tst_atomic: add atomic_add_return for x86/64, ppc/64 and s390/x
>
> Hi!
> > #if HAVE_SYNC_ADD_AND_FETCH == 1
> > +#define HAVE_ATOMIC_ADD_RETURN 1
> > static inline __attribute__((always_inline)) int atomic_add_return(int i,
> > int *v)
> > {
> > return __sync_add_and_fetch(v, i);
> > }
> > -#else
> > +
> > +#else /* HAVE_SYNC_ADD_AND_FETCH == 1 */
> > +
> > +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
> > +#define HAVE_ATOMIC_ADD_RETURN 1
> > +static inline __attribute__((always_inline)) int atomic_add_return(int i,
> > int *v)
> > +{
>
> Maybe we can make the ifdefs a bit more readable by indenting them with
> spaces after the hash.
>
> #else
> # if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
> # define HAVE_ATOMIC_ADD_RETURN 1
>
> ...
>
> # endif
I have re-arranged this in v3, so that there is less nesting,
and also dropped HAVE_ATOMIC_ADD_RETURN.
I also made some other small tweaks, changes are described
in each patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-15 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-14 8:59 [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/4] tst_atomic: make tst_atomic_inc take a signed integer Jan Stancek
2016-04-14 8:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/4] m4: add a check for __sync_add_and_fetch Jan Stancek
2016-04-14 14:33 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-04-14 8:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 3/4] tst_atomic: add atomic_add_return for x86/64, ppc/64 and s390/x Jan Stancek
2016-04-14 14:36 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-04-15 12:08 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2016-04-14 8:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 4/4] tst_atomic: add test for tst_atomic_inc Jan Stancek
2016-04-14 14:43 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-04-14 14:37 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/4] tst_atomic: make tst_atomic_inc take a signed integer Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2021746918.1819347.1460722124804.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox