From: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Cc: Eirik Fuller <efuller@redhat.com>
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2] rtc02: loosen the compare precision with few seconds
Date: Sun, 8 May 2022 11:05:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220508030524.2072035-1-liwang@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEemH2d-83ubH1LF3SotjvxwD_5C0BiLTTZ+yGtaYqv47n28AQ@mail.gmail.com>
That possibly has time elapse between twice operations, especially
on VM we can't guarantee the time precisely equal, let's lose a few
seconds to make the test happy:
tst_test.c:1433: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 10m 00s
rtc02.c:66: TINFO: To set RTC date/time is: 2020-10-09 13:23:30
rtc02.c:80: TINFO: read RTC date/time is: 2020-10-09 13:23:31
rtc02.c:83: TFAIL: RTC SET TEST
Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
Cc: Eirik Fuller <efuller@redhat.com>
Cc: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
---
testcases/kernel/device-drivers/rtc/rtc02.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/device-drivers/rtc/rtc02.c b/testcases/kernel/device-drivers/rtc/rtc02.c
index 0705357bb..8b03b0a90 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/device-drivers/rtc/rtc02.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/device-drivers/rtc/rtc02.c
@@ -40,10 +40,43 @@ static char *rtctime_to_str(struct rtc_time *tm)
static int rtc_tm_cmp(struct rtc_time *set_tm, struct rtc_time *read_tm)
{
- return !((set_tm->tm_sec == read_tm->tm_sec)
- && (set_tm->tm_min == read_tm->tm_min)
- && (set_tm->tm_hour == read_tm->tm_hour)
- && (set_tm->tm_mday == read_tm->tm_mday)
+ long delta, seconds1, seconds2;
+
+ /*
+ * Convert hour/min/sec into seconds to handle the normal
+ * and special situations:
+ * 1#
+ * set_tm: 2022-04-28 13:00:50
+ * read_tm: 2022-04-28 13:00:50
+ * 2#
+ * set_tm: 2022-04-28 13:00:50
+ * read_tm: 2022-04-28 13:00:51
+ * 3#
+ * set_tm: 2022-04-28 13:00:59
+ * read_tm: 2022-04-28 13:01:00
+ * 4#
+ * set_tm: 2022-04-28 13:59:59
+ * read_tm: 2022-04-28 14:00:00
+ *
+ * Note: as we have avoided testing around the zero
+ * clock, so it's impossible to hit situation 5#
+ * set_tm: 2022-04-28 23:59:59
+ * read_tm: 2022-04-29 00:00:00
+ */
+ if (!(set_tm->tm_sec == read_tm->tm_sec)
+ || !(set_tm->tm_min == read_tm->tm_min)
+ || !(set_tm->tm_hour == read_tm->tm_hour)) {
+
+ seconds1 = (set_tm->tm_hour * 3600) + (set_tm->tm_min * 60) + set_tm->tm_sec;
+ seconds2 = (read_tm->tm_hour * 3600) + (read_tm->tm_min * 60) + read_tm->tm_sec;
+
+ delta = seconds2 - seconds1;
+
+ if (delta < 0 || delta > 3)
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ return !((set_tm->tm_mday == read_tm->tm_mday)
&& (set_tm->tm_mon == read_tm->tm_mon)
&& (set_tm->tm_year == read_tm->tm_year));
}
--
2.31.1
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-08 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-28 13:26 [LTP] [PATCH 0/3] fix some bugs in rct02 Li Wang
2022-04-28 13:26 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/3] rtc02: skip test with unsupport set RTC platform Li Wang
2022-04-29 11:07 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-04-29 11:12 ` Li Wang
2022-04-28 13:26 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/3] rtc02: reset backward 1 hour to RTC time Li Wang
2022-04-29 11:09 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-04-28 13:26 ` [LTP] [PATCH 3/3] rtc02: loosen the compare precision with few seconds Li Wang
2022-05-05 14:05 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-05-08 2:22 ` Li Wang
2022-05-08 3:05 ` Li Wang [this message]
2022-05-08 4:19 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Li Wang
2022-05-10 14:08 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-05-11 1:54 ` Li Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220508030524.2072035-1-liwang@redhat.com \
--to=liwang@redhat.com \
--cc=efuller@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox