public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Cc: Eirik Fuller <efuller@redhat.com>
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2] rtc02: loosen the compare precision with few seconds
Date: Sun,  8 May 2022 11:05:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220508030524.2072035-1-liwang@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEemH2d-83ubH1LF3SotjvxwD_5C0BiLTTZ+yGtaYqv47n28AQ@mail.gmail.com>

That possibly has time elapse between twice operations, especially
on VM we can't guarantee the time precisely equal, let's lose a few
seconds to make the test happy:

  tst_test.c:1433: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 10m 00s
  rtc02.c:66: TINFO: To set RTC date/time is: 2020-10-09 13:23:30
  rtc02.c:80: TINFO: read RTC date/time is: 2020-10-09 13:23:31
  rtc02.c:83: TFAIL: RTC SET TEST

Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
Cc: Eirik Fuller <efuller@redhat.com>
Cc: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
---
 testcases/kernel/device-drivers/rtc/rtc02.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/device-drivers/rtc/rtc02.c b/testcases/kernel/device-drivers/rtc/rtc02.c
index 0705357bb..8b03b0a90 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/device-drivers/rtc/rtc02.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/device-drivers/rtc/rtc02.c
@@ -40,10 +40,43 @@ static char *rtctime_to_str(struct rtc_time *tm)
 
 static int rtc_tm_cmp(struct rtc_time *set_tm, struct rtc_time *read_tm)
 {
-	return !((set_tm->tm_sec == read_tm->tm_sec)
-		&& (set_tm->tm_min == read_tm->tm_min)
-		&& (set_tm->tm_hour == read_tm->tm_hour)
-		&& (set_tm->tm_mday == read_tm->tm_mday)
+	long delta, seconds1, seconds2;
+
+	/*
+	 * Convert hour/min/sec into seconds to handle the normal
+	 * and special situations:
+	 * 1#
+	 *       set_tm:  2022-04-28 13:00:50
+	 *       read_tm: 2022-04-28 13:00:50
+	 * 2#
+	 *       set_tm:  2022-04-28 13:00:50
+	 *       read_tm: 2022-04-28 13:00:51
+	 * 3#
+	 *       set_tm:  2022-04-28 13:00:59
+	 *       read_tm: 2022-04-28 13:01:00
+	 * 4#
+	 *       set_tm:  2022-04-28 13:59:59
+	 *       read_tm: 2022-04-28 14:00:00
+	 *
+	 * Note: as we have avoided testing around the zero
+	 * clock, so it's impossible to hit situation 5#
+	 *       set_tm:  2022-04-28 23:59:59
+	 *       read_tm: 2022-04-29 00:00:00
+	 */
+	if (!(set_tm->tm_sec == read_tm->tm_sec)
+		|| !(set_tm->tm_min == read_tm->tm_min)
+		|| !(set_tm->tm_hour == read_tm->tm_hour)) {
+
+		seconds1 = (set_tm->tm_hour  * 3600) + (set_tm->tm_min  * 60) + set_tm->tm_sec;
+		seconds2 = (read_tm->tm_hour * 3600) + (read_tm->tm_min * 60) + read_tm->tm_sec;
+
+		delta = seconds2 - seconds1;
+
+		if (delta < 0 || delta > 3)
+			return 1;
+	}
+
+	return !((set_tm->tm_mday == read_tm->tm_mday)
 		&& (set_tm->tm_mon == read_tm->tm_mon)
 		&& (set_tm->tm_year == read_tm->tm_year));
 }
-- 
2.31.1


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-08  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-28 13:26 [LTP] [PATCH 0/3] fix some bugs in rct02 Li Wang
2022-04-28 13:26 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/3] rtc02: skip test with unsupport set RTC platform Li Wang
2022-04-29 11:07   ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-04-29 11:12     ` Li Wang
2022-04-28 13:26 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/3] rtc02: reset backward 1 hour to RTC time Li Wang
2022-04-29 11:09   ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-04-28 13:26 ` [LTP] [PATCH 3/3] rtc02: loosen the compare precision with few seconds Li Wang
2022-05-05 14:05   ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-05-08  2:22     ` Li Wang
2022-05-08  3:05       ` Li Wang [this message]
2022-05-08  4:19         ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Li Wang
2022-05-10 14:08         ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-05-11  1:54           ` Li Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220508030524.2072035-1-liwang@redhat.com \
    --to=liwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=efuller@redhat.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox