From: Tarun Sahu <tsahu@linux.ibm.com>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Cc: sbhat@linux.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com,
geetika@linux.ibm.com, vaibhav@linux.ibm.com, ltp@lists.linux.it,
mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/5] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs counters
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:33:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221113190332.gyv5t3jvpqps4ug5@tarunpc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221113184438.tmcepansvefom5bk@tarunpc>
On Nov 14 2022, Tarun Sahu wrote:
> > I guess that we can also put the map() (touch()) test_counters() unamp()
> > sequence to a do_test() fuction then call it from the for() loop in
> > run_test(). That would make the code a bit cleaner.
> >
> Instead, I am thinking of a defining a macro like this,
>
> #define CHECK_(fun) ({ \
> if (fun) { \
> break; \
> } \
> })
>
> inside test_counters:
>
> do {
> CHECK_(map(...));
> CHECK_(touch(...));
> CHECK_(unmap(...));
> } while(0)
>
> inside for loop of run_test:
>
> CHECK_(map(...));
> CHECK_(test_counters(...));
> CHECK_(unmap(...));
>
Code will be as clean as the previous, if we can just add
CHECK_ in map, unmap, touch macro definition. like..
#define map(a,b,c,d) CHECK_(map_(a, b, c, d))
> > --
> > Cyril Hrubis
> > chrubis@suse.cz
> >
> > --
> > Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-13 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-08 19:52 [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/5][PART 2] Hugetlb:Migrating the libhugetlbfs tests Tarun Sahu
2022-11-08 19:52 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/5] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs counters Tarun Sahu
2022-11-09 13:12 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-11-09 21:26 ` Tarun Sahu
2022-11-10 8:20 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-11-13 18:44 ` Tarun Sahu
2022-11-13 19:03 ` Tarun Sahu [this message]
2022-11-14 9:49 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-11-14 18:51 ` Tarun Sahu
2022-11-08 19:52 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/5] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs directio Tarun Sahu
2022-11-09 13:25 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-11-09 18:09 ` Tarun Sahu
2022-11-08 19:52 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 3/5] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs fadvise_reserve Tarun Sahu
2022-11-09 16:18 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-11-09 18:40 ` Tarun Sahu
2022-11-10 7:34 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-11-08 19:52 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 4/5] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs fallocate_align Tarun Sahu
2022-11-08 19:52 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 5/5] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs fallocate_basic Tarun Sahu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221113190332.gyv5t3jvpqps4ug5@tarunpc \
--to=tsahu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=geetika@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=sbhat@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox