From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v1] security/dirtyc0w_shmem: Fix remaining cases where UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_SHMEM is absent
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 11:52:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221125105201.59048-1-david@redhat.com> (raw)
When UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_SHMEM is not defined, we still have to make the
checkpoint happy, otherwise our parent process will run into a timeout.
Further, we have to test if UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_SHMEM is really returned by
the UFFD_API ioctl: if the kernel knows about the feature but doesn't
support it, it will be masked off.
Reported-by: Martin Doucha <mdoucha@suse.cz>
Cc: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
.../dirtyc0w_shmem/dirtyc0w_shmem_child.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/dirtyc0w_shmem/dirtyc0w_shmem_child.c b/testcases/kernel/security/dirtyc0w_shmem/dirtyc0w_shmem_child.c
index cb2e9df0c..c117c6f39 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/dirtyc0w_shmem/dirtyc0w_shmem_child.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/dirtyc0w_shmem/dirtyc0w_shmem_child.c
@@ -24,12 +24,12 @@
#include <linux/userfaultfd.h>
#endif
-#ifdef UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_SHMEM
-
#define TST_NO_DEFAULT_MAIN
#include "tst_test.h"
#include "tst_safe_macros.h"
#include "tst_safe_pthread.h"
+
+#ifdef UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_SHMEM
#include "lapi/syscalls.h"
#define TMP_DIR "tmp_dirtyc0w_shmem"
@@ -162,6 +162,10 @@ retry:
"Could not create userfault file descriptor");
}
+ if (!(uffdio_api.features & UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_SHMEM))
+ tst_brk(TCONF,
+ "System does not have userfaultfd minor fault support for shmem");
+
uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) map;
uffdio_register.range.len = page_size;
uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MINOR;
@@ -236,6 +240,10 @@ int main(void)
return 0;
}
#else /* UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_SHMEM */
-#include "tst_test.h"
-TST_TEST_TCONF("System does not have userfaultfd minor fault support for shmem");
+int main(void)
+{
+ tst_reinit();
+ TST_CHECKPOINT_WAKE(0);
+ tst_brk(TCONF, "System does not have userfaultfd minor fault support for shmem");
+}
#endif /* UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_SHMEM */
--
2.38.1
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next reply other threads:[~2022-11-25 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-25 10:52 David Hildenbrand [this message]
2022-11-25 11:12 ` [LTP] [PATCH v1] security/dirtyc0w_shmem: Fix remaining cases where UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_SHMEM is absent Petr Vorel
2022-11-25 11:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-25 12:34 ` Petr Vorel
2022-11-25 11:20 ` Martin Doucha
2022-11-25 12:19 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221125105201.59048-1-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox