* [LTP] [PATCH v2] Add ioctl_loop08 test for LOOP_GET_STATUS lock imbalance
@ 2023-02-15 5:57 xiaoshoukui
2023-02-28 10:06 ` Richard Palethorpe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: xiaoshoukui @ 2023-02-15 5:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
---
.../kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop08.c | 147 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 147 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop08.c
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop08.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop08.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..047273576
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop08.c
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2022 xiaoshoukui <xiaoshoukui@ruijie.com.cn>
+ */
+
+/*\
+ * [Description]
+ *
+ * This is a basic ioctl test about loopdevice LOOP_GET_STATUS
+ * and LOOP_GET_STATUS64.
+ * Commit 2d1d4c1e591f made loop_get_status() drop lo_ctx_mutex before
+ * returning, but the loop_get_status_old(), loop_get_status64(), and
+ * loop_get_status_compat() wrappers don't call loop_get_status() if the
+ * passed argument is NULL. The callers expect that the lock is dropped, so
+ * make sure we drop it in that case, too.
+ *
+ * Fixed by commit:
+ *
+ * commit bdac616db9bbadb90b7d6a406144571015e138f7
+ * Author: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
+ * Date: Fri Apr 06 09:57:03 2018 -0700
+ *
+ * loop: fix LOOP_GET_STATUS lock imbalance
+ */
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <sys/types.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "lapi/loop.h"
+#include "tst_test.h"
+
+#define MAX_MSGSIZE 4096
+
+static const char lock_imbalance[] = "lock held when returning to user space";
+
+static struct tcase {
+ int ioctl_flag;
+ char *message;
+} tcases[] = {
+ { LOOP_GET_STATUS,
+ "Testing LOOP_GET_STATUS lock imbalance" },
+
+ { LOOP_GET_STATUS64,
+ "Testing LOOP_GET_STATUS64 lock imbalance" },
+};
+
+static int find_kmsg(const char *text_to_find)
+{
+ int f, msg_found = 0;
+ char msg[MAX_MSGSIZE + 1];
+
+ f = SAFE_OPEN("/dev/kmsg", O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
+
+ while (1) {
+ TEST(read(f, msg, MAX_MSGSIZE));
+ if (TST_RET < 0) {
+ if (TST_ERR == EAGAIN)
+ /* there are no more messages */
+ break;
+ else if (TST_ERR == EPIPE)
+ /* current message was overwritten */
+ continue;
+ else
+ tst_brk(TBROK | TTERRNO,
+ "err reading /dev/kmsg");
+ } else {
+ /* lines from kmsg are not NULL terminated */
+ msg[TST_RET] = '\0';
+ if (strstr(msg, text_to_find) != NULL) {
+ msg_found = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ SAFE_CLOSE(f);
+
+ if (msg_found)
+ return 0;
+ else
+ return -1;
+}
+
+static void do_child(void)
+{
+ char dev_path[1024];
+ int dev_num, dev_fd;
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tcases); i++) {
+ tst_res(TINFO, "%s", tcases[i].message);
+ dev_num = tst_find_free_loopdev(dev_path, sizeof(dev_path));
+
+ if (dev_num < 0)
+ tst_brk(TBROK, "Failed to find free loop device");
+
+ dev_fd = SAFE_OPEN(dev_path, O_RDWR);
+
+ if (tcases[i].ioctl_flag == LOOP_GET_STATUS)
+ ioctl(dev_fd, LOOP_GET_STATUS, NULL);
+ else
+ ioctl(dev_fd, LOOP_GET_STATUS64, NULL);
+
+ if (dev_fd > 0)
+ SAFE_CLOSE(dev_fd);
+
+ }
+
+ exit(0);
+
+}
+
+static void verify_ioctl_loop(void)
+{
+ int ret, pid;
+
+ pid = SAFE_FORK();
+ if (!pid)
+ do_child();
+
+ ret = TST_PROCESS_STATE_WAIT(pid, 'D', 5000);
+
+ if (!ret && !find_kmsg(lock_imbalance))
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "Trigger ioctl loop lock imbalance");
+ else
+ tst_res(TPASS, "Nothing bad happened, probably");
+
+}
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+ .test_all = verify_ioctl_loop,
+ .needs_root = 1,
+ .needs_kconfigs = (const char *[]) {
+ "CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y",
+ NULL
+ },
+ .tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) {
+ {"linux-git", "bdac616db9bb "},
+ {}
+ },
+ .needs_drivers = (const char *const[]) {
+ "loop",
+ NULL
+ },
+ .forks_child = 1,
+ .timeout = 60,
+};
--
2.20.1
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] Add ioctl_loop08 test for LOOP_GET_STATUS lock imbalance
2023-02-15 5:57 [LTP] [PATCH v2] Add ioctl_loop08 test for LOOP_GET_STATUS lock imbalance xiaoshoukui
@ 2023-02-28 10:06 ` Richard Palethorpe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Richard Palethorpe @ 2023-02-28 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xiaoshoukui; +Cc: ltp
Hello,
xiaoshoukui <xiaoshoukui@gmail.com> writes:
> ---
> .../kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop08.c | 147 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 147 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop08.c
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop08.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop08.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..047273576
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop08.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2022 xiaoshoukui <xiaoshoukui@ruijie.com.cn>
> + */
> +
> +/*\
> + * [Description]
> + *
> + * This is a basic ioctl test about loopdevice LOOP_GET_STATUS
> + * and LOOP_GET_STATUS64.
> + * Commit 2d1d4c1e591f made loop_get_status() drop lo_ctx_mutex before
> + * returning, but the loop_get_status_old(), loop_get_status64(), and
> + * loop_get_status_compat() wrappers don't call loop_get_status() if the
> + * passed argument is NULL. The callers expect that the lock is dropped, so
> + * make sure we drop it in that case, too.
> + *
> + * Fixed by commit:
> + *
> + * commit bdac616db9bbadb90b7d6a406144571015e138f7
> + * Author: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> + * Date: Fri Apr 06 09:57:03 2018 -0700
> + *
> + * loop: fix LOOP_GET_STATUS lock imbalance
> + */
> +
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include "lapi/loop.h"
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +
> +#define MAX_MSGSIZE 4096
> +
> +static const char lock_imbalance[] = "lock held when returning to user space";
> +
> +static struct tcase {
> + int ioctl_flag;
> + char *message;
> +} tcases[] = {
> + { LOOP_GET_STATUS,
> + "Testing LOOP_GET_STATUS lock imbalance" },
> +
> + { LOOP_GET_STATUS64,
> + "Testing LOOP_GET_STATUS64 lock imbalance" },
> +};
> +
> +static int find_kmsg(const char *text_to_find)
> +{
> + int f, msg_found = 0;
> + char msg[MAX_MSGSIZE + 1];
> +
> + f = SAFE_OPEN("/dev/kmsg", O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
> +
> + while (1) {
> + TEST(read(f, msg, MAX_MSGSIZE));
> + if (TST_RET < 0) {
> + if (TST_ERR == EAGAIN)
> + /* there are no more messages */
> + break;
> + else if (TST_ERR == EPIPE)
> + /* current message was overwritten */
> + continue;
> + else
> + tst_brk(TBROK | TTERRNO,
> + "err reading /dev/kmsg");
> + } else {
> + /* lines from kmsg are not NULL terminated */
> + msg[TST_RET] = '\0';
> + if (strstr(msg, text_to_find) != NULL) {
> + msg_found = 1;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + SAFE_CLOSE(f);
> +
> + if (msg_found)
> + return 0;
> + else
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
> +static void do_child(void)
> +{
> + char dev_path[1024];
> + int dev_num, dev_fd;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tcases); i++) {
> + tst_res(TINFO, "%s", tcases[i].message);
> + dev_num = tst_find_free_loopdev(dev_path, sizeof(dev_path));
> +
> + if (dev_num < 0)
> + tst_brk(TBROK, "Failed to find free loop device");
> +
> + dev_fd = SAFE_OPEN(dev_path, O_RDWR);
> +
> + if (tcases[i].ioctl_flag == LOOP_GET_STATUS)
> + ioctl(dev_fd, LOOP_GET_STATUS, NULL);
> + else
> + ioctl(dev_fd, LOOP_GET_STATUS64, NULL);
> +
> + if (dev_fd > 0)
> + SAFE_CLOSE(dev_fd);
> +
> + }
> +
> + exit(0);
> +
> +}
> +
> +static void verify_ioctl_loop(void)
> +{
> + int ret, pid;
> +
> + pid = SAFE_FORK();
> + if (!pid)
> + do_child();
> +
> + ret = TST_PROCESS_STATE_WAIT(pid, 'D', 5000);
> +
> + if (!ret && !find_kmsg(lock_imbalance))
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "Trigger ioctl loop lock imbalance");
> + else
> + tst_res(TPASS, "Nothing bad happened, probably");
> +
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .test_all = verify_ioctl_loop,
> + .needs_root = 1,
> + .needs_kconfigs = (const char *[]) {
> + "CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y",
We don't want to rely on a debugging feature unless necessary. Often
testing is done on production kernels.
If the test is run on a buggy kernel without lockdep then might we get a
deadlock?
So I think it would be best to run the test, but skip the kmsg check if
lockdep is not enabled (using tst_kconfig_get).
> + NULL
> + },
> + .tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) {
> + {"linux-git", "bdac616db9bb "},
> + {}
> + },
> + .needs_drivers = (const char *const[]) {
> + "loop",
> + NULL
> + },
> + .forks_child = 1,
> + .timeout = 60,
> +};
> --
> 2.20.1
--
Thank you,
Richard.
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-02-28 10:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-02-15 5:57 [LTP] [PATCH v2] Add ioctl_loop08 test for LOOP_GET_STATUS lock imbalance xiaoshoukui
2023-02-28 10:06 ` Richard Palethorpe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox