public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Gao via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Cc: rpalethorpe@suse.com, ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] Question on .needs_cgroup_ctrls for cgroupv2
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 10:17:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230227151709.GA12774@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y/zFIdiWccmVzddV@yuki>

On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 03:58:41PM +0100, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> > How to setup correct test case for cgroupv2 check? I try to put following parameter but failed.
> > 
> > struct tst_test test = {
> > 	...
> >         .needs_cgroup_ctrls = (const char *const []){ "unified", NULL },
> >         .needs_cgroup_ver = TST_CG_V2,
> > };
> > 
> > 
> > After some investigation i found cgroup_find_ctrl which called by tst_cg_require seems not implement 
> > how to check cgroupv2, the controllers has no "unified" memeber, should we add CGROUP_CTRL_MEMBER("unified", xxx)
> > into controllers?  Correct me if any misunderstanding.
> > 
> > 
> > void tst_cg_require(const char *const ctrl_name,
> >                         const struct tst_cg_opts *options)
> > {
> >         struct cgroup_ctrl *const ctrl = cgroup_find_ctrl(ctrl_name);
> 
> I think that you are misunderstanding something, controllers that are
> checked by the .needs_cgroup_ctrls and tst_cg_require() are cgroup
> controllers such as memory or cpu controller.
> 
> And unified can be the hierarchy, that means that all controllers are in
> a single mount point which is how controllers are presented in the
> cgroup V2.
> 
> You can have a mix of V1 and V2 controllers on a system and LTP library
> abstracts away all the details so that you can focus on the test logic
> rather than on how things are set up on the system. You have to start by
> specifying which controllers is the test going to use, that's the
> .needs_cgroup_ctrls array and if the test is V2 only you pass the
> TST_CG_V2 in the flags.

So .needs_cgroup_ctrls can not used anymore for ONLY V2 case?
Since i encounter "tst_cgroup.c:848: TCONF: V2 'memory' controller required, but it's mounted on V1" when i add ".needs_cgroup_ctrls = (const char *const []){ "memory", NULL }". 

If yes then i have to manual create V2 cgroup in test case?

BTW is there any example for V2 case? I try to run some case with V2 enalbed but both failed.
> 
> -- 
> Cyril Hrubis
> chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-27 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-27 14:44 [LTP] Question on .needs_cgroup_ctrls for cgroupv2 Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-27 14:58 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-02-27 15:17   ` Wei Gao via ltp [this message]
2023-02-27 15:28     ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-02-27 15:52       ` Richard Palethorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230227151709.GA12774@localhost \
    --to=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=rpalethorpe@suse.com \
    --cc=wegao@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox