public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Gao via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: kernel-qa@suse.de, ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v7] fsconfig03: SKIP check return value for old kernel
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 05:45:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230302104527.GA17006@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZABzqALt4+Zjqtxq@pevik>

On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 11:00:08AM +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi Wei,
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Gao <wegao@suse.com>
> > ---
> >  .../kernel/syscalls/fsconfig/fsconfig03.c     | 21 ++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fsconfig/fsconfig03.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fsconfig/fsconfig03.c
> > index 7ee37f4ae..9adf06207 100644
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fsconfig/fsconfig03.c
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fsconfig/fsconfig03.c
> > @@ -41,15 +41,20 @@ static void run(void)
> >  	if (pagesize == -1)
> >  		tst_brk(TBROK, "sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE) failed");
> 
> > -	for (size_t i = 0; i < 5000; i++) {
> > -		/* use same logic in kernel legacy_parse_param function */
> > -		const size_t len = i * (strlen(val) + 2) + (strlen(val) + 1) + 2;
> > +	if ((tst_kvercmp(5, 17, 1)) >= 0) {
> I suppose 722d94847de29 (in .tags) change the old behavior (from v5.17-rc1).
> Shouldn't be the check against 5.17.0?
> if ((tst_kvercmp(5, 17, 0)) >= 0) {
yes, 5.17.0 is better one!
> 
> 
> > +		for (size_t i = 0; i < 5000; i++) {
> > +			/* use same logic in kernel legacy_parse_param function */
> > +			const size_t len = i * (strlen(val) + 2) + (strlen(val) + 1) + 2;
> 
> > -		if (!strcmp(tst_device->fs_type, "btrfs") && len <= (size_t)pagesize)
> > -			TST_EXP_PASS_SILENT(fsconfig(fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "\x00", val, 0));
> > -		else
> > -			TST_EXP_FAIL_SILENT(fsconfig(fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "\x00", val, 0),
> > -					    EINVAL);
> > +			if (!strcmp(tst_device->fs_type, "btrfs") && len <= (size_t)pagesize)
> > +				TST_EXP_PASS_SILENT(fsconfig(fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "\x00", val, 0));
> > +			else
> > +				TST_EXP_FAIL_SILENT(fsconfig(fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "\x00", val, 0),
> > +						EINVAL);
> > +		}
> > +	} else {
> > +		for (size_t i = 0; i < 5000; i++)
> Repeating the loop again. Wouldn't be more readable moving the if clause to
> separate function and doing if/else inside of for loop?
> 
> Also "\x00" might be in #define (used 3 times).
> 
> Kind regards,
> Petr
> 
> > +			fsconfig(fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "\x00", val, 0);
> >  	}

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-02 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-29 11:50 [LTP] [PATCH v1] fsconfig: New case cover CVE-2022-0185 Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-01 12:49 ` Petr Vorel
2023-02-06 10:38   ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-06 16:19     ` Petr Vorel
2023-02-08  9:01       ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-08 15:48         ` Petr Vorel
2023-02-09  2:25           ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-09 10:10             ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-02-09 11:37               ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-06 16:42     ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-09 13:19 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-09 14:15   ` Petr Vorel
2023-02-09 14:27     ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-02-09 14:40       ` Petr Vorel
2023-02-09 14:53         ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-02-09 14:35     ` Petr Vorel
2023-02-09 14:52       ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-02-09 15:18         ` Petr Vorel
2023-02-10  8:22         ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-10  9:00           ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-13  1:09   ` [LTP] [PATCH v3] fsconfig03: New test CVE-2022-0185 Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-14 11:05     ` Richard Palethorpe
2023-02-16  9:42       ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-16 12:09         ` Richard Palethorpe
2023-02-16 12:54           ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-16 23:52     ` [LTP] [PATCH v4] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-17  7:48       ` Petr Vorel
2023-02-17  8:47       ` Petr Vorel
2023-02-17  9:19         ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-27 16:20       ` Richard Palethorpe
2023-02-28  3:22       ` [LTP] [PATCH v5] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-28  3:27         ` [LTP] [PATCH v6] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-28  8:49           ` Richard Palethorpe
2023-03-01 13:46           ` Martin Doucha
2023-03-01 14:12             ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-03-02  1:45           ` [LTP] [PATCH v7] fsconfig03: SKIP check return value for old kernel Wei Gao via ltp
2023-03-02 10:00             ` Petr Vorel
2023-03-02 10:45               ` Wei Gao via ltp [this message]
2023-03-02 10:03             ` Petr Vorel
2023-03-04  2:03             ` [LTP] [PATCH v8] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-03-07  9:23               ` Petr Vorel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230302104527.GA17006@localhost \
    --to=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=kernel-qa@suse.de \
    --cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=wegao@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox