From: Wei Gao via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it>
To: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4] kill01: New case cgroup kill
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 03:27:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230307082755.GA13371@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEemH2fZs33CkwHY+Jre71eKpkB6bPPmOOxuHZQTGHOofa9KaA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 03:13:56PM +0800, Li Wang wrote:
> Hi Wei,
>
> The new test generally looks good to me.
>
> I'm thinking maybe we make use of guarded buffers which could
> remove the setup/cleanup function then. And doing memset(buf,...)
> before reading into buf[] is quite necessary, to avoid someone
> running this test with parameter '-i N' that the buf[] is polluted
> by the first time.
>
> https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/doc/c-test-api.txt#L1799
>
> <https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/doc/c-test-api.txt#L1799>
> e.g.
I have tried use guarded buffers but compile can not pass.
Following error will trigger since buf_len is caculate instead of FIX constant. So
I suppose we can not use guarded buffers?
kill01.c:131:34: error: initializer element is not constant
.bufs = (struct tst_buffers []) {
For memset before reading buf issue, i will update in next patch.
>
> --- a/testcases/kernel/controllers/kill/kill01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/controllers/kill/kill01.c
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
>
> #define MAX_PID_NUM 100
> #define pid_num MIN(MAX_PID_NUM, (tst_ncpus_available() + 1))
> -#define buf_len (20 * pid_num)
> +#define buf_len (10 * MAX_PID_NUM)
>
> static char *buf;
> static struct tst_cg_group *cg_child_test_simple;
> @@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ static void child_fn(void)
>
> while (getppid() == ppid)
> usleep(1000);
> -
> }
>
> static int cg_run_nowait(const struct tst_cg_group *const cg,
> @@ -82,6 +81,8 @@ static int cg_wait_for_proc_count(const struct
> tst_cg_group *cg, int count)
> int attempts;
> char *ptr;
>
> + memset(buf, 0, buf_len);
> +
> for (attempts = 100; attempts >= 0; attempts--) {
> int nr = 0;
>
> @@ -121,23 +122,14 @@ static void run(void)
> cg_child_test_simple = tst_cg_group_rm(cg_child_test_simple);
> }
>
> -static void setup(void)
> -{
> - buf = SAFE_MALLOC(buf_len);
> - memset(buf, 0, buf_len);
> -}
> -
> -static void cleanup(void)
> -{
> - free(buf);
> -}
> -
> static struct tst_test test = {
> .test_all = run,
> - .setup = setup,
> - .cleanup = cleanup,
> .forks_child = 1,
> .max_runtime = 15,
> .needs_cgroup_ctrls = (const char *const []){ "memory", NULL },
> .needs_cgroup_ver = TST_CG_V2,
> + .bufs = (struct tst_buffers []) {
> + {&buf, .size = buf_len},
> + {}
> + }
> };
>
> Anyway this version you could add my reviewed-by:
>
> Reviewed-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Li Wang
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-07 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-24 2:38 [LTP] [PATCH v1] kill01: New case cgroup kill Wei Gao via ltp
2023-02-24 10:12 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-02-24 12:27 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-03-05 9:10 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-03-06 10:16 ` Li Wang
2023-03-06 14:54 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-03-06 15:13 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-03-06 23:57 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-03-07 7:13 ` Li Wang
2023-03-07 8:27 ` Wei Gao via ltp [this message]
2023-03-07 11:23 ` Li Wang
2023-03-07 8:51 ` [LTP] [PATCH v5] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-03-07 11:37 ` Li Wang
2023-03-09 21:40 ` Petr Vorel
2023-03-15 12:23 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-03-13 10:45 ` Richard Palethorpe
2023-03-15 5:47 ` Li Wang
2023-03-15 12:55 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-03-16 11:10 ` Richard Palethorpe
2023-03-18 5:00 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-03-15 18:52 ` Petr Vorel
2023-03-18 4:52 ` [LTP] [PATCH v6] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-03-29 6:28 ` Petr Vorel
2023-04-19 15:18 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-04-19 15:18 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 1/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-04-19 15:18 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 2/2] tst_cgroup.c: Add a cgroup pseudo controller Wei Gao via ltp
2023-04-21 1:26 ` [LTP] [PATCH v8 0/2] kill01: New case cgroup kill Wei Gao via ltp
2023-04-21 1:26 ` [LTP] [PATCH v8 1/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-04-21 6:35 ` Li Wang
2023-04-21 1:26 ` [LTP] [PATCH v8 2/2] tst_cgroup.c: Add a cgroup pseudo controller Wei Gao via ltp
2023-04-21 4:33 ` Li Wang
2023-04-21 10:58 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-04-22 13:53 ` [LTP] [PATCH v9 0/2] kill01: New case cgroup kill Wei Gao via ltp
2023-04-22 13:53 ` [LTP] [PATCH v9 1/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-04-26 13:11 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-04-27 12:13 ` Shivani Samala
2023-04-27 12:18 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-04-22 13:53 ` [LTP] [PATCH v9 2/2] tst_cgroup.c: Add a cgroup pseudo controller Wei Gao via ltp
2023-04-23 6:46 ` Li Wang
2023-04-26 13:12 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-04-28 0:16 ` [LTP] [PATCH v10 0/2] kill01: New case cgroup kill Wei Gao via ltp
2023-04-28 0:17 ` [LTP] [PATCH v10 1/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-04-28 8:04 ` Petr Vorel
2023-04-28 0:17 ` [LTP] [PATCH v10 2/2] tst_cgroup.c: Add a cgroup base controller Wei Gao via ltp
2023-04-28 7:59 ` Petr Vorel
2023-04-28 10:10 ` [LTP] [PATCH v11 0/2] New case test cgroup kill feature Wei Gao via ltp
2023-04-28 10:10 ` [LTP] [PATCH v11 1/2] tst_cgroup.c: Add a cgroup base controller Wei Gao via ltp
2023-04-28 10:10 ` [LTP] [PATCH v11 2/2] cgroup_core03.c: New case test cgroup kill feature Wei Gao via ltp
2023-04-30 7:48 ` [LTP] [PATCH v12 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2023-04-30 7:48 ` [LTP] [PATCH v12 1/2] tst_cgroup.c: Add a cgroup base controller Wei Gao via ltp
2023-04-30 13:44 ` Li Wang
2023-04-30 23:39 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-05-02 6:56 ` Petr Vorel
2023-05-02 9:12 ` Petr Vorel
2023-04-30 7:48 ` [LTP] [PATCH v12 2/2] cgroup_core03.c: New case test cgroup kill feature Wei Gao via ltp
2023-04-30 13:44 ` Li Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230307082755.GA13371@localhost \
--to=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=liwang@redhat.com \
--cc=wegao@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox