From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 361E6C7618A for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 08:23:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E4D3CCD23 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 09:23:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0BC23C86E0 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 09:23:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7986200077 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 09:23:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C26281F88B; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 08:23:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1679300618; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nVsZXDGhdQF2UpfP8tVYZuCmDFJB06w0EdZkKwh3RIU=; b=LW9esBcx0MGmu6S0pB0qgcYjKmv3b9FHxXN6yYTe3sUAV3NMWopyxmn5qQNjAHimIhVVjd ns98uxojGmFBvFPJtyLB46hX3295LzFj2FRN74TRTa2vWqmc+Bkbq58k4+d4rRgC1Mz0Tk iQbel1HVPQM39TDSuglTnk2vA4vxlcw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1679300618; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nVsZXDGhdQF2UpfP8tVYZuCmDFJB06w0EdZkKwh3RIU=; b=FH9ELFOm9Z6ROxB9a+KXftXxHWbCu9tFdqCVfl6jrE/JdVhcDuj21/7vP081wH6OmCmokw dfQcx6tCIZ8DBYDA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58D1213A00; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 08:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id QWnSEgoYGGQgTgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Mon, 20 Mar 2023 08:23:38 +0000 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 09:23:36 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Richard Palethorpe , ltp@lists.linux.it Message-ID: <20230320082336.GA182681@pevik> References: <20230314114037.25581-1-rpalethorpe@suse.com> <20230314175438.GB79562@pevik> <20230320080415.GA179863@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230320080415.GA179863@pevik> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Add goals of patch review and tips X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi all, > + also add Tested: link-to-github-actions-run below --- in patch would help > (it's than obvious that maintainer does not have to bother with doing it or > not hope that it fails on CentOS 7 old compiler or very new Fedora compiler). > Maybe also encourage people to create account in the patchwork and maintain > status their patches would help (set "Superseded" if they sent new patch version, > other statuses like "Accepted" or "Changes requested" are also sometimes > forgotten by the maintainer who post comments or merge the patch). Example why helping to maintain the patches by submitter would help: mknod01: Rewrite the test using new LTP API [1] followed by [v2,1/1] mknod01: Rewrite the test using new LTP API [2]. Li reviewed v2, but later Cyril pushed v1 (manually updating patch) without update patchwork. (Li review was ignored, I tried to apply v2 to merge it because status was not updated.) Kind regards, Petr [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20230222034501.11800-1-akumar@suse.de/ [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20230228154203.2783-1-akumar@suse.de/ > Both of these are small helps, but they still help LTP maintainers to have more > time for the review or for writing own patches. > But I can post a follow-up patch with these after your patch is merged if you > don't want to formulate them. > Kind regards, > Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp