public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>, ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] tst_net.sh: Detect IPv6 disabled via sysct
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 17:35:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230322163509.GB369840@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230322162046.GA369840@pevik>

Hi Cyril,

> > > +	cmd='sysctl -n net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6'

> > I'm not sure why we should use sysctl when this the same as doing

> > cat /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/disable_ipv6
> > Or is there any added value from the sysctl command?

> No, but we already use sysctl in tst_init_iface():
> sysctl -qw net.ipv6.conf.$iface.accept_dad=0 || return $?
> tst_rhost_run -c "sysctl -qw net.ipv6.conf.$iface.accept_dad=0" || return $?

> and we don't check for sysctl (expecting is everywhere). I'd also allow using
> sysctl (and then add a check via tst_require_cmds) or change also these with
> cat for reading and echo ... > for writing. WDYT?

BTW tst_set_sysctl() and it's use would need to be rewritten to get benefit of
getting rid of using sysctl. But I can use cat in this case to not extending
sysctl dependency.

Kind regards,
Petr

> Kind regards,
> Petr

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-22 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-17 15:10 [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/2] tst_net.sh IPv6 sysctl fixes Petr Vorel
2023-02-17 15:10 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] tst_net.sh: Detect IPv6 disabled via sysct Petr Vorel
2023-03-07 12:59   ` Richard Palethorpe
2023-03-22 13:08   ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-03-22 16:20     ` Petr Vorel
2023-03-22 16:35       ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2023-03-22 16:35       ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-03-23  5:17         ` Petr Vorel
2023-02-17 15:10 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] tst_net.sh: Detect IPv6 disabled on interface via sysctl Petr Vorel
2023-03-07 13:01   ` Richard Palethorpe
2023-03-22 13:10   ` Cyril Hrubis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230322163509.GB369840@pevik \
    --to=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox