From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 238FEC76195 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 10:40:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC39D3CCBA2 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:40:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E29C3CA2F9 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:39:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85EA12009F9 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:39:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BC92219CE; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 10:39:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1679999993; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GwzGOMbfgCaLSqbGaB0hREirR6jzpycHNQBwCJTZ0Vo=; b=n4g0RE4quTXQMaq8NN4Kvdzt97hCtWcG80o69zsXeavTtXAJZpRvbRKjGAVcFQvtdQc2RH jEYNES3fyR1KhZwCwEyayZ0dMVRu5ONTQUCaGXZFSxFSaFijA8Xc8j+kuJDoqd6Iqobo5b Qj9o6G+w2OGg4LwjcKWpXk2R+Nrmiz8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1679999993; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GwzGOMbfgCaLSqbGaB0hREirR6jzpycHNQBwCJTZ0Vo=; b=Qt9sHw9aRzWDNqOs0fjBEjzLIcZ6uPgPMYVCeiOJWQXlxLd8OuFyLhL/S6ucUixiyIzbvU U/F8xHiYaY1qhVBw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D5461390D; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 10:39:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id znC7AfnDImRHcgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 28 Mar 2023 10:39:53 +0000 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:39:51 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Li Wang Message-ID: <20230328103951.GA755576@pevik> References: <20230323121330.92244-1-paulson@zilogic.com> <20230324103334.GA557284@pevik> <20230328081710.GB743322@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Added test for mmap() with MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE. X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, Paulson Raja L Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" ... > > Li, if you don't mind, I'll merge "v2" I prepared [1] (part of > > paulson/mmap.fixes branch in my fork). Can I add your Reviewed-by tag? As the > > work is already done, I'd prefer to postpone the work you propose to separate > > patch after. > Of course yes!! Feel free to do that. Li, thanks for your ack, merged. > My suggestion is only to Paulson for familiarity with the patch > contribute workflow, > but he can get to know this by your operation too. +1 Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp