Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] nfslock01.sh: Don't test on NFS v3 on TCP

[Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>]

Hi,

> Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] nfslock01.sh: Don't test on NFS v3 on TCP

Obviously, the subject should not contain "on TCP" (first, I removed only TCP
entries in runtest file, but because I expect it would be problematic also on
UDP). Also tst_brk TCONF does not check TCP/UDP either (only NFS v3).

I'll update that before merge (don't send new version).

Kind regards,
Petr

> nfs_flock (run via nfslock01.sh) is known to fail on NFS v3 [1]:

>     not unsharing /var makes AF_UNIX socket for host's rpcbind to become
>     available inside ltp_ns. Then, at NFS v3 mount time, kernel creates
>     an instance of lockd for ltp_ns, and ports for that instance leak to
>     host's rpcbind and overwrite ports for lockd already active for root
>     namespace. This breaks nfs3 file locking.

> Before bd512e733 ("nfs_flock: fail the test if lock/unlock ops fail")
> it run indefinitely with "unhandled error -107":
> [ 2840.099565] lockd: cannot monitor 10.0.0.2
> [ 2840.109353] lockd: cannot monitor 10.0.0.2
> [ 2843.286811] xs_tcp_setup_socket: connect returned unhandled error -107
> [ 2850.198791] xs_tcp_setup_socket: connect returned unhandled error -107

> bd512e733 caused an early abort (therefore only "cannot monitor 10.0.0.2"
> appears).

> Although there is suggestion, how to fix the problem in kernel [2]:

>     > Maybe rpcb_create_local() shall detect that it is not in root
>     > netns, and only try AF_INET connection to > localhost in that case.

>     That would be simple and might be sensible.  IF changing the AF_UNIX
>     path to "/run/rpcbind.sock" isn't sufficient, then testing for the
>     root_ns is probably the best second option.

> Until it's implemented, it's better to:
> * don't test on NFS v3 on both TCP and UDP (remove from the runtest file)
> * skip the test with TCONF in case version 3 is passed on command line

> NOTE: Tested only on TCP (UDP is disabled in kernel by default via
> NFS_DISABLE_UDP_SUPPORT).

> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/YebcNQg0u5cU1QyQ@pevik/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/164254401568.24166.883582030601071761@noble.neil.brown.name/

> Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> ---
>  runtest/net.nfs                              | 4 ----
>  testcases/network/nfs/nfslock01/nfslock01.sh | 6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/runtest/net.nfs b/runtest/net.nfs
> index 72cf4b307..a73956015 100644
> --- a/runtest/net.nfs
> +++ b/runtest/net.nfs
> @@ -83,13 +83,9 @@ nfs4_ipv6_08 nfs08.sh -6 -v 4 -t tcp
>  nfs41_ipv6_08 nfs08.sh -6 -v 4.1 -t tcp
>  nfs42_ipv6_08 nfs08.sh -6 -v 4.2 -t tcp

> -nfslock3_01 nfslock01.sh -v 3 -t udp
> -nfslock3t_01 nfslock01.sh -v 3 -t tcp
>  nfslock4_01 nfslock01.sh -v 4 -t tcp
>  nfslock41_01 nfslock01.sh -v 4.1 -t tcp
>  nfslock42_01 nfslock01.sh -v 4.2 -t tcp
> -nfslock3_ipv6_01 nfslock01.sh -6 -v 3 -t udp
> -nfslock3t_ipv6_01 nfslock01.sh -6 -v 3 -t tcp
>  nfslock4_ipv6_01 nfslock01.sh -6 -v 4 -t tcp
>  nfslock41_ipv6_01 nfslock01.sh -6 -v 4.1 -t tcp
>  nfslock42_ipv6_01 nfslock01.sh -6 -v 4.2 -t tcp
> diff --git a/testcases/network/nfs/nfslock01/nfslock01.sh b/testcases/network/nfs/nfslock01/nfslock01.sh
> index fbcc3c00f..78904281b 100755
> --- a/testcases/network/nfs/nfslock01/nfslock01.sh
> +++ b/testcases/network/nfs/nfslock01/nfslock01.sh
> @@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ TST_TESTFUNC="do_test"

>  do_setup()
>  {
> +	local i
> +
> +	for i in $VERSION; do
> +		[ "$v" = 3 ] && tst_brk TCONF "Test is known to fail on NFSv3"
> +	done
> +
>  	nfs_setup

>  	tst_res TINFO "creating test files"

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp