From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 2/5] fcntl41: test for owner values on OFD posix locks
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 11:38:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230621093828.GA386889@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230530203707.2965684-3-aahringo@redhat.com>
Hi Alexander,
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl/fcntl41.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl/fcntl41.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..40d14ff02
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl/fcntl41.c
...
> +#include <sys/wait.h>
> +
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +
> +static int fd, fd2;
> +
> +void do_child1(void)
> +{
> + const struct flock fl_0_0 = {
> + .l_type = F_WRLCK,
> + .l_whence = SEEK_SET,
> + .l_start = 0L,
> + .l_len = 1L,
> + };
> +
> + tst_res(TINFO, "thread1 waits for thread2 to lock 1-1");
> + TST_CHECKPOINT_WAIT(1);
> +
> + tst_res(TINFO, "thread1 lock region 0-0 - It should block");
> + SAFE_FCNTL(fd2, F_OFD_SETLKW, &fl_0_0);
F_OFD_SETLKW is undefined on old Cent0S 7, we still support:
https://github.com/pevik/ltp/actions/runs/5331934790/jobs/9660442246
You need to use our fallback to avoid this.
#include "lapi/fcntl.h"
We also have fcntl_common.h, which is used for F_OFD_* (fcntl_compat(),
you may need to use it. It also includes lapi/fcntl.h.
Kind regards,
Petr
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-21 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-30 20:37 [LTP] [PATCH 0/5] fcntl: add more testcases Alexander Aring
2023-05-30 20:37 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/5] fcntl40: test for owner values on classic posix lock Alexander Aring
2023-06-21 9:03 ` Petr Vorel
2023-06-30 19:59 ` Alexander Aring
2023-07-02 19:18 ` Petr Vorel
2023-07-05 13:23 ` Alexander Aring
2023-07-07 8:14 ` Petr Vorel
2023-07-07 12:50 ` Alexander Aring
2023-07-07 13:17 ` Petr Vorel
2023-07-02 19:19 ` Petr Vorel
2023-05-30 20:37 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/5] fcntl41: test for owner values on OFD posix locks Alexander Aring
2023-06-21 9:38 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2023-06-30 20:00 ` Alexander Aring
2023-05-30 20:37 ` [LTP] [PATCH 3/5] fcntl42: test for F_SETLKW interruption case Alexander Aring
2023-05-30 20:37 ` [LTP] [PATCH 4/5] fcntl43: test for identical F_SETLKW lock requests Alexander Aring
2023-05-30 20:37 ` [LTP] [PATCH 5/5] fcntl44: test for kill child while others waiting Alexander Aring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230621093828.GA386889@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=aahringo@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox