From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0E1CEB64DA for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2023 12:07:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8473C99D2 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2023 14:07:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FF8A3C1B84 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2023 14:07:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDAA0200770 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2023 14:07:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F60C20550; Tue, 4 Jul 2023 12:07:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1688472451; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=K36L4WpTmixtImbFHQIAL5HB6f92lnvs5oGhI6YPjtE=; b=wyQo2W/cLWQ/Sbw4sSOHwHbsZ4x4c6AT1C6AtgosF8bdAkOzo3eFjSp8KQRk80fsS2BmRO pEQTwG0cDXJB/Q5AhYToUDIahk60UNt8O32K3uF8bFZIudYYoaDLDT6kuqf2eb6GBPz3r0 MObB2gp6iY6rUIy4OseiBMboAW6WSvc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1688472451; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=K36L4WpTmixtImbFHQIAL5HB6f92lnvs5oGhI6YPjtE=; b=NxvIiJWY8uUYNsP4RXwOg44cV+DLIQhfOfn939i+rOYf7Tqi2lvxw1O3ZP2eTghdxD46Jm OI7sfAEDNfPQYEDw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15BD51346D; Tue, 4 Jul 2023 12:07:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id BtUkBIMLpGQOKAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 04 Jul 2023 12:07:31 +0000 Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 14:07:29 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Cyril Hrubis Message-ID: <20230704120729.GE507064@pevik> References: <20230704091933.496989-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20230704091933.496989-3-pvorel@suse.cz> <20230704115013.GD507064@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.1 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC PATCH 2/3] lib/C-API: Add option -V to print LTP version X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > Hi! > > > Why don't we print that as a part of help? Do we really need to allocate > > > a flag for this? > > Well, people expect -V or --verbose. But because I add printing also on running > > test, we could just move it to -h. > You mean --version right? Yes, I'm sorry for a confusion. > > BTW I was also thinking about using getopt_long(), at least to allow --help, > > I guess you don't think any value in it. > I do not think that it's importan enough to spend time on, but feel free > to send a patch. Agree. A real reason would be if netstress.c would need to have some more options (there are still some room left, but not many). Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp