From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] write05: Simplify test using TST_ macros
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 16:31:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230721143152.GA1428451@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4864592.31r3eYUQgx@localhost>
> Hi Petr,
> On Friday, July 21, 2023 3:33:30 PM IST Petr Vorel wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> > ---
> > testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/write05.c | 20 +++-----------------
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/write05.c
> > b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/write05.c index c1e48f1df..1e85cce6d
> > 100644
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/write05.c
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/write05.c
> > @@ -59,26 +59,12 @@ static void verify_write(unsigned int i)
> > sigpipe_cnt = 0;
> > - TEST(write(*tc->fd, *tc->buf, tc->size));
> > -
> > - if (TST_RET != -1) {
> > - tst_res(TFAIL, "write() succeeded unexpectedly");
> > - return;
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (TST_ERR != tc->exp_errno) {
> > - tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO,
> > - "write() failed unexpectedly, expected %s",
> > - tst_strerrno(tc->exp_errno));
> > + TST_EXP_FAIL(write(*tc->fd, *tc->buf, tc->size), tc->exp_errno);
> Should we use TST_EXP_FAIL2 instead?
Good catch, write() requires TST_EXP_FAIL2(). Thanks!
Merged with this fix.
> Maybe we can also do the ascii doc changes and headers cleanup, but I'm fine if
> we do that in a separate patch.
I dared to merge this before without a review as it's simple (bad habit).
Generally, the best approach (which I not always follow) is to separate changes.
That's why I usually add docparse change as a separate commit. But I usually
update copyright with other changes (that's really minor change).
> Reviewed-by: Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de>
Kind regards,
Petr
> Regards,
> Avinesh
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-21 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-21 10:03 [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] write05: Simplify test using TST_ macros Petr Vorel
2023-07-21 12:29 ` Avinesh Kumar
2023-07-21 14:31 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230721143152.GA1428451@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=akumar@suse.de \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox