From: Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/mmap21: Add new test for mmap's ENOMEM case
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 16:49:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230831112629.21510-1-akumar@suse.de> (raw)
To be more precise in this test and checking for ENOMEM on exact mapping
when limit is crossed, I could only think of counting the existing
mappings from /proc/$pid/maps and counting the remaining possible
mappings. Is there any better approach if we want to test this for exact
case?
Signed-off-by: Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de>
---
testcases/kernel/syscalls/mmap/mmap21.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/mmap/mmap21.c
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/mmap/mmap21.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/mmap/mmap21.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..76002edb3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/mmap/mmap21.c
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2023 SUSE LLC Avinesh Kumar <avinesh.kumar@suse.com>
+ */
+
+/*\
+ * [Description]
+ *
+ * Verify that, mmap(2) fails with errno ENOMEM when process's
+ * maximum number of mappings would have been exceeded.
+ */
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include "tst_test.h"
+
+#define TEMPFILE "mmapfile"
+static int fd;
+static size_t page_sz;
+static int max_map;
+
+static void setup(void)
+{
+ page_sz = getpagesize();
+
+ fd = SAFE_OPEN(TEMPFILE, O_RDWR | O_CREAT, 0666);
+
+ SAFE_FILE_SCANF("/proc/sys/vm/max_map_count", "%d ", &max_map);
+ tst_res(TINFO, "max_map_count: %d", max_map);
+}
+
+static void run(void)
+{
+ int i;
+ char *addr[max_map];
+
+ for (i = 0; i < max_map; i++) {
+ TESTPTR(mmap(0, page_sz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_FILE | MAP_SHARED, fd, 0));
+ if (TST_RET_PTR != MAP_FAILED) {
+ addr[i] = TST_RET_PTR;
+ } else {
+ if (TST_ERR == ENOMEM) {
+ tst_res(TINFO, "New successful mappings before exhausting the limit: %d", i);
+ tst_res(TPASS, "mmap() failed with ENOMEM");
+ } else {
+ tst_res(TINFO, "New successful mappings before mmap() failed: %d", i);
+ tst_res(TFAIL | TERRNO, "mmap() failed with unexpected errno");
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (i == max_map)
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "mmap() crossed max_map_count limit, no of new mmapings: %d", i);
+
+ while (--i >= 0)
+ SAFE_MUNMAP(addr[i], page_sz);
+}
+
+static void cleanup(void)
+{
+ if (fd > 0)
+ SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
+}
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+ .setup = setup,
+ .cleanup = cleanup,
+ .test_all = run,
+ .needs_tmpdir = 1
+};
--
2.41.0
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next reply other threads:[~2023-08-31 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-31 11:19 Avinesh Kumar [this message]
2023-08-31 12:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/mmap21: Add new test for mmap's ENOMEM case Cyril Hrubis
2023-09-08 9:45 ` Richard Palethorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230831112629.21510-1-akumar@suse.de \
--to=akumar@suse.de \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox